mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Where Quality Breaks in Compressed Short-Text Generation: Staged Bottleneck Localization

arXiv 2607.24176 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Compressed short-text generators can fail in two different places: the codec may discard information before generation starts, or the latent generator may produce weak codes. Without separating these failure modes, researchers can spend compute improving the wrong component. We study this problem in a controlled 64-to-16 TinyStories case study built from a hierarchical VQ-VAE-2 codec and a masked discrete diffusion generator (MDLM). We use a staged validation protocol that separates codec reconstruction fidelity, latent generation quality, and auxiliary latent diagnostics under one shared external GPT-2 scorer, while reporting complementary semantic metrics for the geometry study. In the tested configuration, codec reconstruction alone raises median external perplexity from 15.17 to 27.36 (+80.4%) and p95 from 25.10 to 98.91 (+294.1%), showing that the dominant quality loss appears before latent generation begins. Under the same scorer, code-space MDLM remains materially stronger than token-space diffusion, reducing mean, median, and p95 by 32.9%, 30.9%, and 36.6%, respectively. Geometry-aware regularization improves local latent proxies but does not improve decoded-text metrics in the available runs. The contribution is methodological rather than algorithmic: the paper presents a reusable staged diagnosis for one concrete pipeline and shows that, in this setting, codec fidelity rather than latent denoising sets the practical quality ceiling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  5. 2021Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spacescited by 1,665
  6. 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,376
  7. 2022MaskGIT: Masked Generative Image Transformercited by 1,082
  8. 2022Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generationcited by 1,006
  9. 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 800
  10. 2023Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distributioncited by 712
  11. 2021Argmax Flows and Multinomial Diffusion: Learning Categorical Distributionscited by 566
  12. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
1 more
  1. 2022SSD-LM: Semi-autoregressive Simplex-based Diffusion Language Model for Text Generation and Modular Controlcited by 191

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Fixed RAG Compression Collapses Measured Reader Scaling
  2. 2026Few-step Generative Models as Lossy Compression
  3. 2026Rethinking Generative Image Compression at Extremely Low Bitrates
  4. 2026ZeroSense:How Vision matters in Long Context Compression
  5. 2026Locally Confident, Globally Stuck: The Quality-Exploration Dilemma in Diffusion Language Models
  6. 2026Denoising Blocks, Not Tokens: Efficient Compressed Continuous Diffusion with Branching Token Realization
  7. 2026Quantization Undoes Alignment: Bias Emergence in Compressed LLMs Across Models and Precision Levels
  8. 2026Diffusion LMs Can Approximate Optimal Infilling Lengths Implicitly