Embeddings based Anomaly Detection for Cleaning Global Crop Type Reference Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High quality reference data remain a critical bottleneck for crop-type mapping at any spatial and temporal scale. Operational systems such as WorldCereal aggregate labels from heterogeneous sources such as parcel registers, national databases, field surveys, and map-derived products, each with their own biases, coverage gaps and unknown label noise. Simple global rules are inadequate, since crop phenology and observation conditions vary strongly across regions and seasons. In this study, we focus on a single, operationally relevant question: whether embeddings produced through geospatial foundation models are a viable basis for cleaning the reference data. We propose a practical, locality-aware, embedding-based anomaly (EBA) detection framework that operates on the embeddings of a pretrained Earth-observation encoder. We score each labelled sample against other samples of the same crop in the same area using a pretrained embedding, flag the ones that stand out, and test whether removing or down-weighting them before training yields a better model. We establish that the flagged points are genuinely mislabelled or misplaced in two independent ways: against synthetic ground truth, the detector concentrates injected label errors 2.5-5x above chance in its flagged set (detection AUROC up to 0.84); and on real data, a model-independent test shows that removing or confidence-weighting the flagged held-out points raises measured accuracy in trained models, for both crop type and land cover. Acting on the flags then improves the WorldCereal crop-type model across five macro-regions, evaluated on a fixed held-out split under three views. We find conservative cleaning helps while over-cleaning hurts. The EBA detector approach is designed to be reproducible and extensible, and can serve as a template for cleaning large, noisy Earth observation reference datasets beyond crop mapping.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 581
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2022SatMAE: Pre-training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 406
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 391
- 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 147
- 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 128
- 2023Lightweight, Pre-trained Transformers for Remote Sensing Timeseriescited by 102
- 2019Self-attention for raw optical Satellite Time Series Classificationcited by 75
- 2025Deploying Geospatial Foundation Models in the Real World: Lessons from WorldCerealcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.