Subject-Level Heterogeneity in EEG Motor Imagery Decoding: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Portfolio-Based Reduction of the Search Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robust EEG motor imagery decoding remains limited by strong inter-individual variability, making it difficult to identify pipelines that generalize across users. We present a large-scale, standardized within-session benchmark of decoding pipelines across three public datasets: Cho2017 (52 subjects), PhysionetMI (109 subjects), and Zhou2016 (4 subjects). Using a common MOABB LeftRightImagery setting, two frequency bands (8-15 Hz and 8-30 Hz), and a broad combination of feature extraction, preprocessing, and classification steps, we analyzed 216,714 raw evaluation rows, which after structured aggregation yielded 44,928, 109,000, and 4,192 subject-level observations respectively. Covariance tangent-space projection (cov-tgsp) and Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) consistently defined the strongest methodological families, though their relative ordering was dataset-dependent. On Cho2017, the best family-level mean accuracy came from cov-tgsp in 8-30 Hz (0.712 +/- 0.140), whereas Zhou2016 favored CSP (0.832 +/- 0.121 in 8-15 Hz). These aggregate rankings concealed substantial subject-level heterogeneity: 42 distinct winning pipelines across 52 Cho2017 subjects, and 93 across 109 PhysionetMI subjects. We then used the benchmark as an empirical performance landscape for building compact portfolios of pipelines of size K. Several construction procedures were compared, including a ranking-based Top-K Mean heuristic and search-based strategies. Results were broadly consistent, with Top-K Mean giving the best trade-off. A single best global pipeline already retained 94.2% of the oracle in Cho2017 and 81.8% in PhysionetMI; at K = 12, oracle retention rose to 96.5% and 90.0%. The landscape is therefore subject-dependent, and this heterogeneity can be exploited through compact portfolios that make personalization more feasible.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 72 references.
References · 8
- 2019Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic reviewcited by 155
- 2024The largest EEG-based BCI reproducibility study for open science: the MOABB benchmarkcited by 28
- 2022Toward cross-subject and cross-session generalization in EEG-based emotion recognition: Systematic review, taxonomy, and methodscited by 17
- 2019Progress in Brain Computer Interfaces: Challenges and Trendscited by 13
- 2023EEG-DG: A Multi-Source Domain Generalization Framework for Motor Imagery EEG Classificationcited by 9
- 2023Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'cited by 3
- 2023Singular value decomposition based matrix surgerycited by 3
- 2022Power Spectral Density-Based Resting-State EEG Classification of First-Episode Psychosiscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.