mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'

arXiv 2302.06281 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023q-bio.NC cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of 'neurorights' the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or are in conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work here is to provide conceptual, ethical and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal and policy discussions.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.