mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Reducing Foreign Language Anxiety Using Level-Appropriate Embodied Conversational Agents

arXiv 2607.21887 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2026cs.HC cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Foreign language anxiety (FLA) can be a major barrier to second language acquisition (SLA), especially in conversational contexts. With the proliferation of large language models (LLMs) throughout all areas of life, recent work suggests that interacting with LLM agents can be instrumental within the field of SLA and foreign language education, especially for reducing FLA. Related work also suggests that linguistic demands and task complexity can be predictors of FLA, implying that the use of demanding, complex language could lead to learners experiencing higher FLA. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-agent embodied conversational system that generates level-appropriate dialogue for English language learners. These levels are based on those defined by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) to describe non-native listener and speaker proficiency. Using a "generate-evaluate-regenerate" loop with multiple LLM agents and a level classifier, it achieves a desired simplicity that is adaptive to the user's proficiency level. We also share the results of a preliminary small-sample pilot study that tested this system with Japanese university students, to see whether it would yield lower FLA levels than an unsimplified embodied conversational agent. Analysis of conversational output showed that 87.4% of dialogue sentences generated by the proposed multi-agent system fell within one predicted CEFR level of the learner's self-assessed proficiency, compared to 54.1% for the unsimplified agent. This suggests that the novel system is better able to produce output at an appropriate level for the learner. Though this study did not yield statistically significant evidence that the system reduces FLA levels in Japanese learners of English, likely due to a small sample size, it provides usability findings and culturally-informed design insights that will inform future study.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

Builds on

1 of 7 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Ace-CEFR -- A Dataset for Automated Evaluation of the Linguistic Difficulty of Conversational Texts for LLM Applicationscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023The Use of Multiple Conversational Agent Interlocutors in Learning
  2. 2026Controllable Spoken Dialogue Generation: An LLM-Driven Grading System for K-12 Non-Native English Learners
  3. 2025Talking with Oompa Loompas: A novel framework for evaluating linguistic acquisition of LLM agents
  4. 2025Simulating Students with Large Language Models: A Review of Architecture, Mechanisms, and Role Modelling in Education with Generative AI
  5. 2026Hybrid LLM-Embedded Dialogue Agents for Learner Reflection: Designing Responsive and Theory-Driven Interactions
  6. 2025Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Survey
  7. 2025Dialogic Pedagogy for Large Language Models: Aligning Conversational AI with Proven Theories of Learning
  8. 2025Agent-Centric Projection of Prompting Techniques and Implications for Synthetic Training Data for Large Language Models