The Quadrilateral Loss: Additivity as a Measurable Behavior of Dense Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Additive models buy interpretability by forbidding feature interactions, a constraint that neural instantiations enforce architecturally. We introduce the quadrilateral loss, a differentiable penalty that treats additivity as a measurable behavior instead: a second-order mixed difference on pairs of training points swapping one coordinate, which vanishes if and only if the coordinate carries no interaction, remains informative for piecewise-linear networks, and equals in expectation the per-coordinate interaction mass of the interventional Shapley-GAM. The loss turns additivity into a dial - most learned interactions prove removable almost for free, and on small datasets a moderate penalty improves accuracy and additivity simultaneously - and into an online observable: its per-feature surrender curves show, across seeds and datasets, that pre-regularization interaction magnitude barely predicts what a regularized model retains, undermining post-hoc interaction rankings. Against this instrument we compare routes to exact additivity, spanning structural masks, behavioral penalties (optionally crystallized into exact structure), weight decay, backfitting, the shared-section model, and bagged boosted stumps: constraining behavior before structure dominates weight-space constraints, rankings reverse between data regimes, and converging routes agree on the shape functions themselves. Three silent failure modes we document share one anatomy: guarantees imported into settings that quietly void their preconditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
- 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 538
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2020Explaining Explanations: Axiomatic Feature Interactions for Deep Networkscited by 103
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2020GAMI-Net: An Explainable Neural Network based on Generalized Additive Models with Structured Interactionscited by 82
- 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
6 more
- 2022From Shapley Values to Generalized Additive Models and backcited by 59
- 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
- 2019Purifying Interaction Effects with the Functional ANOVA: An Efficient Algorithm for Recovering Identifiable Additive Modelscited by 41
- 2022Scalable Interpretability via Polynomialscited by 25
- 2023Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principlescited by 15
- 2023Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Modelscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.