mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models

arXiv 2305.11475 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) have recently experienced a resurgence in popularity due to their interpretability, which arises from expressing the target value as a sum of non-linear transformations of the features. Despite the current enthusiasm for GAMs, their susceptibility to concurvity - i.e., (possibly non-linear) dependencies between the features - has hitherto been largely overlooked. Here, we demonstrate how concurvity can severly impair the interpretability of GAMs and propose a remedy: a conceptually simple, yet effective regularizer which penalizes pairwise correlations of the non-linearly transformed feature variables. This procedure is applicable to any differentiable additive model, such as Neural Additive Models or NeuralProphet, and enhances interpretability by eliminating ambiguities due to self-canceling feature contributions. We validate the effectiveness of our regularizer in experiments on synthetic as well as real-world datasets for time-series and tabular data. Our experiments show that concurvity in GAMs can be reduced without significantly compromising prediction quality, improving interpretability and reducing variance in the feature importances.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

16 of 45 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  5. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  6. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
  7. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  8. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  9. 2015Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representationscited by 94
  10. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  11. 2017All You Need is Beyond a Good Init: Exploring Better Solution for Training Extremely Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Orthonormality and Modulationcited by 58
  12. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
4 more
  1. 2020How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?cited by 44
  2. 2016Regularizing CNNs with Locally Constrained Decorrelationscited by 41
  3. 2022Scalable Interpretability via Polynomialscited by 25
  4. 2021NeuralProphet: Explainable Forecasting at Scalecited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

12 papers.