mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SenWorld: A Digital-Twin Simulation for Generating Context-Rich Evaluation Data

arXiv 2607.19949 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Smartphone personal assistants reason over longitudinal personal data, yet evaluating them requires context-rich evaluation data whose correct answers are known, and real device traces are too privacy-sensitive to share. To address this challenge, we present SenWorld, a physically grounded, deterministic, event-sourced digital-twin simulation that generates such data with ground truth fixed by construction. In SenWorld, personas live through a full day in a world built from real map, weather, holiday, and network data; every observable signal is archived in full-system snapshots; and each evaluation case is labeled by a pointer to an existing record rather than by post-hoc annotation or a large language model (LLM) judge. We evaluate this method with 16 personas in Beijing. The generated data closely matches the held-out real-user benchmark in category distribution (Jensen--Shannon divergence (JSD) 0.070) and in the daily rhythm of communication records (JSD below 0.1), though generated records remain shorter than real ones. Without scripted interaction, personas form a fully reciprocated dialogue subgraph and differentiated behavioral repertoires. Projected into 717 evaluation cases, the generated data exposes 78 failures in a production smartphone assistant, concentrating on call and Short Message Service (SMS) records while contacts, schedules, and alarms never fail. The snapshot pointer confirms each failure as an assistant-side retrieval error, with no LLM judge involved. Overall, SenWorld offers a privacy-safe, reproducible, and distribution-checked path to evaluation data whose labels are fixed by construction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 22 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  4. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  5. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 450
  6. 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 257
  7. 2023Large Language Models Empowered Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: A Survey and Perspectivescited by 253
  8. 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 235
  9. 2023AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Androidcited by 178
  10. 2023An Empirical Study of the Non-determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generationcited by 134
  11. 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 102
  12. 2025MobileWorld: Benchmarking Autonomous Mobile Agents in Agent-User Interactive and MCP-Augmented Environmentscited by 69
6 more
  1. 2024GPTVoiceTasker: Advancing Multi-step Mobile Task Efficiency Through Dynamic Interface Exploration and Learningcited by 13
  2. 2024Test Oracle Automation in the era of LLMscited by 11
  3. 2024Training a Vision Language Model as Smartphone Assistantcited by 8
  4. 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomycited by 8
  5. 2026State-Grounded Multi-Agent Synthetic Data Generation for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 4
  6. 2025SmartBench: Is Your LLM Truly a Good Chinese Smartphone Assistant?cited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.