mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Asymptotically Optimal Regret for Reinforcement Learning without Horizon Dependence

arXiv 2607.19854 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

We study horizon-free regret minimization for finite-horizon time-homogeneous tabular Markov decision processes with S states, A actions, horizon H, and per-trajectory total reward bounded by 1. We propose a new algorithm and prove a regret upper bound [tilde O(√SAK+S8A3)] with failure probability δ, where K is the number of episodes and tilde O(·) hides mathsfpolylog(S,A,K,1/δ). Thus, the regret is H-free and asymptotically optimal, matching the contextual-bandit lower bound Omega(√SAK) up to logarithmic factors. This completely removes the log H dependence from the previous tilde O(√SAKlog H+S2Alog H) guarantee of Zhang et al. (2021), and drastically improves the prior best horizon-free regret tilde O(√S9A3K) of Zhang et al. (2022) asymptotically. The main technical difficulty is that the optimal value functions Vh^*h=1H are time-inhomogeneous even though the transition kernel is time-homogeneous. A direct union bound over all value functions typically incurs an additional minlog H,S factor. We avoid this factor by (i) exploiting the monotonicity of Vh^* in h and (ii) non-trivially projecting the value functions onto an S-dimensional grid. Our analysis relies on three additional ingredients. First, we introduce a horizon-truncation argument that enables reward-based exploration and removes the cost of a separate reward-free exploration phase. Second, we design a cutting bonus that preserves both optimism and the monotonicity needed for planning. Third, we prove a new bound on total deviation for time-homogeneous MDPs, which controls the clipped variance terms in the cutting bonus with adjustable polynomial dependence on S and without any dependence on H. Together, these tools yield an asymptotically optimal horizon-free regret guarantee.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 42 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 205
  2. 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
  3. 2019Q-learning with UCB Exploration is Sample Efficient for Infinite-Horizon MDPcited by 55
  4. 2020A Unifying View of Optimism in Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 52
  5. 2018Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning in MDPscited by 43
  6. 2021Near-Optimal Randomized Exploration for Tabular Markov Decision Processescited by 15
  7. 2020Towards Tractable Optimism in Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Horizon-Free Regret for Linear Markov Decision Processes
  2. 2026Optimal Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Infinite-Horizon MDPs
  3. 2021Fast Rates for the Regret of Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Improved Regret Bound for Safe Reinforcement Learning via Tighter Cost Pessimism and Reward Optimism
  5. 2025Tail Distribution of Regret in Optimistic Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024Information-Theoretic Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning based on Duality
  7. 2024Efficient Exploration in Average-Reward Constrained Reinforcement Learning: Achieving Near-Optimal Regret With Posterior Sampling
  8. 2022Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Multi-batch Reinforcement Learning