Elicitation without Backpropagation: Steering Model Behavior by Optimizing the Latent Posterior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the latent posterior model of transformer behavior, the next-token distribution arises from a posterior over latent predictive models conditioned on the context, mixed to generate continuations. We exploit this model in settings where it is exact, namely Bayes-filtered transformers (BFTs) meta-learned on sequences from a hierarchical prior, to introduce Posterior Prefix Tuning (PPT), a new method for eliciting behavior from a transformer: given a utility function on continuations, find a prompt under which the transformer generates continuations of high expected utility. For a BFT, the elicitation objective factors through the latent posterior, and the gradient of this objective can be estimated from samples of the prior alone. PPT optimizes the parameters of a distribution over hard prompts: it draws prior samples once from the BFT via predictive Monte Carlo (PMC), then estimates the gradient by importance sampling against them. The optimization performs no transformer forward passes and no backpropagation through the transformer, and the prior samples are utility-independent, so a single set of samples drives elicitation against any number of utilities at negligible marginal cost. We validate PPT on Beta--Bernoulli and reinforced urn BFTs across three utility families (reverse cross-entropy, frequency matching, Dyck validity).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.
Builds on
25 of 28 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 202
- 2023In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prismcited by 78
- 2025Persona Features Control Emergent Misalignmentcited by 76
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
- 2019Meta-learning of Sequential Strategiescited by 68
13 more
- 2023Personas as a Way to Model Truthfulness in Language Modelscited by 46
- 2021Martingale posterior distributionscited by 43
- 2024Who's asking? User personas and the mechanics of latent misalignmentcited by 40
- 2020Meta-trained agents implement Bayes-optimal agentscited by 37
- 2024Learning Universal Predictorscited by 29
- 2023Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributionscited by 14
- 2025Constrained belief updates explain geometric structures in transformer representationscited by 14
- 2025Understanding Prompt Tuning and In-Context Learning via Meta-Learningcited by 6
- 2025TabMGP: Martingale Posterior with TabPFNcited by 6
- 2025Next-token pretraining implies in-context learningcited by 5
- 2025Why is prompting hard? Understanding prompts on binary sequence predictorscited by 4
- 2026Uncertainty Decomposition for Bayes-Filtered Transformers via Bayesian Predictive Inferencecited by 4
- 2026What does a Bayes-filtered transformer believe? A predictive Monte Carlo approachcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.