mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enabling Multilingual Privacy Policy Audits: Large-Scale Analysis of Spanish Mobile Apps

arXiv 2607.18424 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.CY cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated analyses of privacy policies enable large-scale assessments of transparency in digital ecosystems, yet existing auditing pipelines remain predominantly English-centric. This limits their ability to systematically evaluate multilingual environments, as in the European Union, where many services disclose privacy practices only in local languages. This paper examines whether large language models (LLMs) can extend privacy policy analysis beyond English without requiring language-specific adaptation, thus empowering large-scale auditing in linguistically diverse app ecosystems. We assemble an evaluation corpus spanning all 24 official EU languages from translated versions of two established expert-annotated datasets (OPP-115 and MAPP) and assess translation fidelity through automated metrics and targeted legal-expert review. Our LLM-based classifier for identifying categories of personal data collection achieves stable cross-lingual performance, with macro-F1 scores ranging between 0.91 and 0.94. We then leverage this capability in a large-scale audit of 2,611 Android applications from the Spanish Google Play Store. Combining multilingual privacy policy analysis with the evaluation of corresponding privacy labels and runtime network traffic exposes an important linguistic barrier: public-sector apps predominantly provide privacy policies in Spanish, whereas popular commercial apps mostly provide them in English. We reveal systematic discrepancies between declared and observed practices, especially in public-sector apps. Overall, our results indicate how English-only privacy audits can systematically obfuscate transparency gaps in multilingual environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 75 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  2. 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
  3. 2020Privacy Policies over Time: Curation and Analysis of a Million-Document Datasetcited by 28
  4. 2020Privacy at Scale: Introducing the PrivaSeer Corpus of Web Privacy Policiescited by 22
  5. 2024Large Language Models: A New Approach for Privacy Policy Analysis at Scalecited by 14
  6. 2018Automatic Detection of Vague Words and Sentences in Privacy Policiescited by 10
  7. 2015ReCon: Revealing and Controlling PII Leaks in Mobile Network Trafficcited by 9
  8. 2021Are iPhones Really Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Appscited by 6
  9. 2023Unpacking Privacy Labels: A Measurement and Developer Perspective on Google's Data Safety Sectioncited by 6
  10. 2018Third Party Tracking in the Mobile Ecosystemcited by 5
  11. 2023ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labelscited by 5
  12. 2024Evaluating Privacy Perceptions, Experience, and Behavior of Software Development Teamscited by 4
3 more
  1. 2022Creation and Analysis of an International Corpus of Privacy Lawscited by 3
  2. 2022Longitudinal Analysis of Privacy Labels in the Apple App Storecited by 2
  3. 2016Tracking the Trackers: Towards Understanding the Mobile Advertising and Tracking Ecosystemcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.