OrientSAM: Mitigating Camera-Centric Shortcut in Multimodal Spatial Reasoning via Orientation-Aware Spatial Alignment
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still struggle with spatial reasoning that requires perspective transformation. In particular, they often rely on camera-centric cues rather than reasoning from the reference object's viewpoint, leading to systematic errors in non-camera reference settings. In this paper, we first analyze this failure mode and show that object orientation is a key factor underlying such camera-centric shortcut behavior. To address this issue, we propose OrientSAM, an orientation-aware spatial alignment framework for multimodal models. OrientSAM injects explicit orientation information into multimodal representations through orientation-aware tokens and Fourier-based angle encoding, and further adopts a curriculum learning strategy to progressively improve perspective-aware reasoning. In addition, we build a spatial data construction pipeline to generate orientation-aware spatial supervision from large-scale images. Experiments on Spatial-MM, ViewSpatial, and 3DSRBench show that OrientSAM consistently outperforms strong baselines, especially on non-camera-view, person-centric, and orientation-sensitive tasks. The results further demonstrate that explicit orientation modeling is important for mitigating camera-centric shortcut behavior and enabling more robust allocentric spatial reasoning in multimodal models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Cognitively-Inspired Tokens Overcome Egocentric Bias in Multimodal Models23 Jan
- 2025Think with 3D: Geometric Imagination Grounded Spatial Reasoning from Limited Views21 Oct
- 2025How Far are VLMs from Visual Spatial Intelligence? A Benchmark-Driven Perspective23 Sep
- 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models27 May
- 2025Perspective-Aware Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Mental Imagery Simulation24 Apr
- 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models25 Mar
- 20243DSRBench: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning Benchmark10 Dec
- 2024GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs19 Jun
Other references · 6
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025Spatial Forcing: Implicit Spatial Representation Alignment for Vision-language-action Modelcited by 134
- 20253D Aware Region Prompted Vision Language Modelcited by 33
- 2025SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluationcited by 29
- 2024Seeing Through Their Eyes: Evaluating Visual Perspective Taking in Vision Language Modelscited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Correspondence to Actions: Human-Like Multi-Image Spatial Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models
- 2025Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks
- 2026LAST: Leveraging Tools as Hints to Enhance Spatial Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025SpinBench: Perspective and Rotation as a Lens on Spatial Reasoning in VLMs
- 2025RotBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Identifying Image Rotation
- 2026OmniView-Space: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning via Multi-Perspective Spatial Mapping
- 2024Coarse Correspondences Boost Spatial-Temporal Reasoning in Multimodal Language Model
- 2025Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods