mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Asymmetric Peak-Aware Loss for Peak-Critical Time Series Forecasting

arXiv 2607.14871 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many operational time-series forecasting applications, such as crowd demand forecasting, the risk related to under-prediction is substantially higher than that of over-prediction. Accurate prediction of rare demand spikes plays a critical role in downstream tasks. Yet most time-series forecasters are trained with symmetric objectives (e.g., MSE, MAE) and evaluated primarily on aggregate error, which can mask failures in extreme-values and peak-timing predictions. We introduce Asymmetric Peak-Aware Loss (APAL), a simple, model-agnostic objective that (i) penalizes under-predictions more heavily and (ii) increases the training weight of peak regions within each forecast window. We further propose a peak-critical evaluation protocol that complements MAE/MSE with channel-wise tail error (Top-10% and Top-1%) and peak metrics (precision, recall, F1 under timing tolerance, and peak timing error). We evaluate APAL on long-horizon multivariate forecasting across five state-of-the-art backbones, with a focus on pedestrian demand forecasting using (i) a production-ready subset of the City of Melbourne pedestrian hourly count dataset and (ii) a beach visitor count dataset. The generality of the loss function for time-series forecasting is tested on additional benchmarks. Across peak-critical datasets and settings, APAL improves tail accuracy and peak-prediction quality while exposing a controllable trade-off with aggregate error, making it a practical solution when peak-prediction failures are the dominant operational concern.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

16 of 45 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
  3. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
  4. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
  5. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
  6. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 906
  7. 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 869
  8. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
  9. 2017Soft-DTW: a Differentiable Loss Function for Time-Seriescited by 265
  10. 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
  11. 2023TSMixer: Lightweight MLP-Mixer Model for Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 136
  12. 2019Shape and Time Distortion Loss for Training Deep Time Series Forecasting Modelscited by 66
4 more
  1. 2025Patch-wise Structural Loss for Time Series Forecastingcited by 34
  2. 2015Forecaster's Dilemma: Extreme Events and Forecast Evaluationcited by 20
  3. 2022TILDE-Q: A Transformation Invariant Loss Function for Time-Series Forecastingcited by 8
  4. 2024Multi-Sample Dynamic Time Warping for Few-Shot Keyword Spottingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.