Alipay-PIBench: A Realistic Payment Integration Benchmark for Coding Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Payment integration is a demanding repository-level software task: agents must select a suitable product, implement coordinated client-server flows, verify payment outcomes, and preserve consistency between transaction and business states. We introduce Alipay-PIBench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on realistic Alipay payment integration. It contains nine product-specific projects and 18 task instances, each organized into Basic functional-completion and Advanced risk-aware hardening scenarios. Scenario-specific rubrics support deterministic static, unit, integration, and end-to-end checks, supplemented by LLM-assisted assessment for semantic requirements. We evaluate six coding-agent models and report rubric pass rate (RPR). Under the with-skill condition, mean RPR ranges from 68.58% to 91.37%. Access to the alipay-payment-integration skill improves mean RPR by 10.31 percentage points on average relative to the without-skill condition, with gains varying across models, products, and scenarios. Method-level results distinguish source-level completion, executable payment behavior, and payment-domain requirements. Alipay-PIBench provides a controlled setting for diagnosing model capability and evaluating structured guidance in payment integration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks8 Jul
- 2026BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?3 Mar
- 2026ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development2 Feb
- 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents14 Dec
Other references · 7
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
- 2025FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementationcited by 57
- 2025ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problemscited by 17
- 2026Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?cited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Task Success: Measuring Workflow Fidelity in LLM-Based Agentic Payment Systems
- 2026Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering
- 2025GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging
- 2026TessPay: Verify-then-Pay Infrastructure for Trusted Agentic Commerce
- 2026Agentic Commerce World: An Auditable and Verifiable Environment for Vibe Commerce
- 2026RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications
- 2025On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
- 2026MerchantBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Term Coherence in E-Commerce Operations