mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Task Success: Measuring Workflow Fidelity in LLM-Based Agentic Payment Systems

arXiv 2605.06457 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed for payment workflows, yet prevailing metrics, Task Success Rate (TSR) and Agent Handoff F1-Score (HF1), capture only final outcomes or unordered routing decisions. We introduce the Agentic Success Rate (ASR), a trajectory-fidelity metric that compares observed and expected agent execution sequences at the transition level, decomposing performance into Transition Recall and Transition Precision. Applied to the Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Payments (HMASP) across 18 LLMs and 90,000 task instances, ASR reveals that 10 of 18 models systematically skip a confirmation checkpoint during payment checkout, a deviation invisible to both TSR and HF1, while 8 models enforce the checkpoint perfectly. Notably, GPT-4.1 exhibits hidden workflow shortcuts despite achieving perfect TSR and HF1, while GPT-5.2 achieves perfect ASR. Prompt refinements and deterministic routing guards guided by ASR diagnostics yield substantial TSR improvements, with gains up to +93.8 percentage points for previously struggling models, demonstrating that trajectory-level evaluation is essential in regulated domains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  2. 2024Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation10 Oct

Other references · 11

  1. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  3. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  4. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 319
  5. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
  6. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Frameworkcited by 182
  7. 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 145
  8. 2024FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Makingcited by 112
  9. 2025Standard Benchmarks Fail -- Auditing LLM Agents in Finance Must Prioritize Riskcited by 13
  10. 2024Enhancing Trust and Safety in Digital Payments: An LLM-Powered Approachcited by 4
  11. 2026A Novel Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Payments Using LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Staying on Task: Testing the Foundations of Long-Horizon Agent Reliability
  2. 2026Beyond Task Completion: Revealing Corrupt Success in LLM Agents through Procedure-Aware Evaluation
  3. 2026Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows
  4. 2026Claw-Eval-Live: A Live Agent Benchmark for Evolving Real-World Workflows
  5. 2026Alipay-PIBench: A Realistic Payment Integration Benchmark for Coding Agents
  6. 2026ReliabilityBench: Evaluating LLM Agent Reliability Under Production-Like Stress Conditions
  7. 2026Learning What to Skip: Counterfactual Credit Assignment for Efficient Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
  8. 2026MerchantBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Term Coherence in E-Commerce Operations