mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CASP: Learning-Augmented Offline Approximation with Verifiable Certificates and Bounded-Loss PAC Guarantees

arXiv 2607.14545 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-learned predictions can speed up offline NP-hard optimization, but asking a predictor what to do amounts to asking it to solve the problem, and committing an unchecked prediction forfeits every worst-case guarantee. CASP (Certificate-Augmented Solution Pruning) instead asks which parts of the search space may be ignored, and accepts each answer only after a sound polynomial-time verifier has checked it, so correctness never depends on prediction quality. We develop the learning theory of this design. The verifier makes the induced loss class uniformly bounded, so certificate parameters are learnable from tilde O(varepsilon-2log K) samples (K the maximum instance size), whereas the unverified commitment class admits no distribution-free rate and, under cost spread R, none below Omega(R/varepsilon2). Filtering noisy predictions by verifiable confidence dominates the standard min-combiner, with a margin we compute in closed form, and the prediction stays useful even given the LP, because it breaks ties on degenerate optimal faces, where every symmetric LP policy, meaning one whose commitments depend on the instance only through the verifiable confidence values, provably stalls. Experiments on five problems test the theory's quantitative predictions. With trained predictors, unverified pruning loses up to 26% of the optimum under distribution shift, while the verified deployment of the same predictions loses nothing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 623
  2. 2021Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networkscited by 268
  3. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 195
  4. 2020Solving Mixed Integer Programs Using Neural Networkscited by 182
  5. 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 153
  6. 2020The Primal-Dual method for Learning Augmented Algorithmscited by 80
  7. 2018Learning to Branchcited by 78
  8. 2024Improving Online Algorithms via ML Predictionscited by 66
  9. 2020Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithmscited by 64
  10. 2015A PAC Approach to Application-Specific Algorithm Selectioncited by 58
  11. 2021Faster Matchings via Learned Dualscited by 56
  12. 2016Gap Safe screening rules for sparsity enforcing penaltiescited by 39
9 more
  1. 2019How much data is sufficient to learn high-performing algorithms? Generalization guarantees for data-driven algorithm designcited by 27
  2. 2022Algorithms with Prediction Portfolioscited by 19
  3. 2024Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization with Predictionscited by 8
  4. 2019Fine-grained Search Space Classification for Hard Enumeration Variants of Subset Problemscited by 7
  5. 2024Sample Complexity of Algorithm Selection Using Neural Networks and Its Applications to Branch-and-Cutcited by 7
  6. 2025Polynomial Time Learning-Augmented Algorithms for NP-hard Permutation Problemscited by 5
  7. 2024Max-Cut with ε-Accurate Predictionscited by 4
  8. 2024Competitive strategies to use "warm start" algorithms with predictionscited by 4
  9. 2025Improved Approximations for Hard Graph Problems using Predictionscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.