mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CIPHER: A Decoupled Exploration-Selection Framework for Test-Time Scaling of Data Science Agents

arXiv 2607.14386 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Data science tasks span from closed-ended information extraction to open-ended analysis, presenting significant challenges for automation. Recent AI agents powered by language models show promise for handling such complex tasks. However, existing agents typically rely on a single initial state that conditions the entire agent's execution, making them vulnerable to cascading errors initiated by a suboptimal initial state. To mitigate this, we present CIPHER, an automated data science agent that leverages test-time scaling through the generation and selection of multiple initial states for concurrent execution. Unlike existing works on test-time scaling of AI agents, CIPHER explicitly decouples the generation of candidate initial states from their strategic selection for parallel execution. Through extensive evaluation on two benchmarks (closed-form and open-form tasks), we demonstrate that CIPHER exceeds state-of-the-art performance in matched-model comparisons, and remains competitive against larger-model baselines despite relying on a substantially smaller base LM. Our empirical study characterizes the design space of the Decoupled Exploration-Selection (DES) framework: we quantify how generation strategy, selection strategy, and aggregator model capacity contribute to overall performance, and derive actionable design recommendations for practitioners.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

Builds on

27 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SPIO: Ensemble and Selective Strategies via LLM-Based Multi-Agent Planning in Automated Data Science30 Mar
  2. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug11 Apr

Other references · 25

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  5. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  6. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  7. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  8. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  9. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  10. 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scalingcited by 135
  11. 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Taskscited by 134
  12. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 125
13 more
  1. 2025Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrievalcited by 118
  2. 2016Evaluation of a Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Data Sciencecited by 73
  3. 2025Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agentscited by 59
  4. 2025Wider or Deeper? Scaling LLM Inference-Time Compute with Adaptive Branching Tree Searchcited by 48
  5. 2025Flash-Searcher: Fast and Effective Web Agents via DAG-Based Parallel Executioncited by 27
  6. 2024ToolBeHonest: A Multi-level Hallucination Diagnostic Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 25
  7. 2025Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling: Efficiency Limits and Linguistic Signalscited by 17
  8. 2025Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 16
  9. 2025Optimizing Sequential Multi-Step Tasks with Parallel LLM Agentscited by 14
  10. 2024Generating Diverse Hypotheses for Inductive Reasoningcited by 6
  11. 2025Generalized Parallel Scaling with Interdependent Generationscited by 6
  12. 2025Think in Parallel, Answer as One: Logit Averaging for Open-Ended Reasoningcited by 5
  13. 2026When Agents Disagree: The Selection Bottleneck in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelinescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Stateless Language Agents: Scaling Long-Horizon Automated Research
  2. 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking
  3. 2026DS-Lighting: Making Agent Harnesses Explicit for Data-Science Automation
  4. 2026FML-bench: A Controlled Study of AI Research Agent Strategies from the Perspective of Search Dynamics
  5. 2026EPOCH: Reliable Discovery through Evidence-Governed Search
  6. 2026Scaling Discovery through Test-Time Communication
  7. 2025Supporting Our AI Overlords: Redesigning Data Systems to be Agent-First
  8. 2026Hunt Instead of Wait: Evaluating Deep Data Research on Large Language Models