LatentFlow: A General Framework for Conditioning Stochastic Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic-process models are, as a rule, far easier to simulate than to condition. Non-linear observations, non-Gaussian likelihoods, black-box information, and global constraints all induce intractable conditional laws, requiring bespoke, model-specific constructions. We introduce LatentFlow, a single framework for conditioning stochastic processes, with no learned neural approximations and no training. Our starting point is to write the stochastic process as the deterministic image of a tractable latent innovation, f0 = Tvartheta(xi0), with xi0 sampled from a simple reference distribution. This reduces process-level conditioning to latent-space inference: pull the likelihood back through Tvartheta, sample the resulting latent law with a tractable guided probability flow, and push the samples forward. This construction is provably exact at the level of the target law; in practice, approximation enters only through finite terminal noising, Monte Carlo guidance, and time discretisation of the continuous-time dynamics, each of which is explicit and systematically reducible. As LatentFlow is training-free, conditioning reduces to solving a single reverse-time SDE. This enables conditional sampling in seconds on a single desktop CPU across model classes that have never shared a scalable method: classical spatial priors, nonlinear stochastic dynamics, mechanistic models from the physical and life sciences, stochastic PDEs, heavy-tails and extremes, point and discrete-state processes, and neural or simulator-defined processes.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 105 of its 174 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2026.
Builds on
105 of 174 references.
References · 105
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
- 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,416
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
38 more
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 602
- 2023Universal Guidance for Diffusion Modelscited by 437
- 2018Neural Processescited by 311
- 2013A survey of the Schr"odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transportcited by 292
- 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 283
- 2023Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Modelscited by 232
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 228
- 2025A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Modelscited by 224
- 2023I2SB: Image-to-Image Schr"odinger Bridgecited by 218
- 2021Path Integral Sampler: a stochastic control approach for samplingcited by 181
- 2023Denoising Diffusion Samplerscited by 149
- 2019Convolutional Conditional Neural Processescited by 142
- 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
- 2020Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriorscited by 127
- 2014On the relation between optimal transport and Schr"odinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpointcited by 99
- 2025Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Expertscited by 96
- 2021Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlocited by 90
- 2020On the Convergence of SGD with Biased Gradientscited by 83
- 2023Score-based Diffusion Models in Function Spacecited by 82
- 2023Diffusion Bridge Mixture Transports, Schr"odinger Bridge Problems and Generative Modelingcited by 80
- 2019NeuTra-lizing Bad Geometry in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Using Neural Transportcited by 74
- 2023Functional Flow Matchingcited by 67
- 2020Pathwise Conditioning of Gaussian Processescited by 64
- 2021Bayesian Learning via Neural Schr"odinger-F"ollmer Flowscited by 56
- 2020A Survey of Constrained Gaussian Process Regression: Approaches and Implementation Challengescited by 52
- 2021Simulating Diffusion Bridges with Score Matchingcited by 52
- 2022Neural Diffusion Processescited by 50
- 2020Composing Normalizing Flows for Inverse Problemscited by 48
- 2024DEFT: Efficient Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models by Learning the Generalised h-transformcited by 46
- 2014Student-t Processes as Alternatives to Gaussian Processescited by 45
- 2025On the Guidance of Flow Matchingcited by 45
- 2014Variational Gaussian Process State-Space Modelscited by 43
- 2017Linearly constrained Gaussian processescited by 42
- 2018Variational Implicit Processescited by 41
- 2023Generalized Schr"odinger Bridge Matchingcited by 40
- 2023Continuous-Time Functional Diffusion Processescited by 39
- 2024Neural Methods for Amortized Inferencecited by 39
50 most cited of 105 All 105 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Feature Space Adaptation for Effortless Gaussian Process Flowscited by 0
- 2026Spatial Prediction with Guided Diffusioncited by 0
- 2026Spatial Prediction with Guided Diffusion9 Oct 2026
- 2026Feature Space Adaptation for Effortless Gaussian Process Flows8 Oct 2026