mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Design Choices in Splitting-Based Self-Supervised Sparse-View CT Reconstruction

arXiv 2607.10898 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised data splitting has emerged as a promising paradigm for sparse-view CT reconstruction, enabling training from incomplete measurements without fully sampled ground truth. However, the influence of key design choices, including partitioning strategy, preprocessing, and inference, remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we introduce a unified framework that decomposes splitting-based reconstruction into these three components, enabling controlled comparison of existing methods and two incremental extensions: multi-partition splitting and an alternative inference strategy. Experiments on simulated LoDoPaB-CT data under independent and correlated noise, together with validation on the real-world 2DeteCT dataset, show that the optimal partitioning strategy strongly depends on the measurement noise structure. Lattice-based splitting performs favorably under independent noise, whereas angular masking is more robust under correlated noise and real measured data. Multi-partition splitting consistently improves over pure projection-wise splitting in several settings. Complementary perceptual and structural metrics, including LPIPS and HaarPSI, reveal differences between masking strategies that are less apparent from PSNR and SSIM alone. These results provide practical guidelines for designing self-supervised sparse-view CT reconstruction methods and highlight the limitations of common independence assumptions in realistic imaging environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
  5. 2018Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Imagescited by 364
  6. 2019Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervisioncited by 276
  7. 2021Equivariant Imaging: Learning Beyond the Range Spacecited by 83
  8. 2016A Haar Wavelet-Based Perceptual Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 57
  9. 2021Robust Equivariant Imaging: a fully unsupervised framework for learning to image from noisy and partial measurementscited by 56
  10. 2024A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical imagescited by 10
  11. 20232DeteCT -- A large 2D expandable, trainable, experimental Computed Tomography dataset for machine learningcited by 9
  12. 2024Sparse2Inverse: Self-supervised inversion of sparse-view CT datacited by 8
2 more
  1. 2025Equivariance2Inverse: A Practical Self-Supervised CT Reconstruction Method Benchmarked on Real, Limited-Angle, and Blurred Datacited by 5
  2. 2020Self-Supervised Training For Low Dose CT Reconstructioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.