To Answer or to Abstain: Mitigating Search-Agent Hallucinations via Abstention-Aware Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with search tools and outcome-reward reinforcement learning (RL) have achieved new state-of-the-art results on open-domain QA tasks. However, we argue that current training paradigms harbor a critical vulnerability: they predominantly reward correct answers but fail to penalize fabricated ones when retrieval fails, thereby implicitly exacerbating hallucinations. To address this, we propose Abstention-Aware Reinforcement Learning (AWA-RL), which dynamically shapes the abstention reward utilizing the model's query-specific prior capabilities and continuous on-policy training observations. We also introduce a novel metric, RA-F1, to measure the capability-reliability trade-off. Compared to non-abstaining baselines, AWA-RL boosts absolute precision by up to 10.3% and overall RA-F1 by 2.9%, with only marginal sacrifice in raw accuracy. These results confirm that AWA-RL successfully yields highly capable and reliable search agents. The code, data, and model weights are publicly available at https://github.com/zfj1998/AWA-RL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 15
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
- 2025ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMscited by 377
- 2025AbstentionBench: Reasoning LLMs Fail on Unanswerable Questionscited by 129
- 2023Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Surveycited by 92
- 2024Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedbackcited by 64
- 2024Reducing Tool Hallucination via Reliability Alignmentcited by 37
- 2025The Hallucination Tax of Reinforcement Finetuningcited by 35
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Train for Truth, Keep the Skills: Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward Mitigates Hallucinations
- 2025Beyond Outcome Reward: Decoupling Search and Answering Improves LLM Agents
- 2025Enhancing Reliability across Short and Long-Form QA via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search
- 2025TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search: Foundations, Roles, Optimizations, Evaluations, and Applications
- 2026BAPO: Boundary-Aware Policy Optimization for Reliable Agentic Search
- 2025Thinking, Faithful and Stable: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs