mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CAFE: A Compound-AI Factorial Evaluation Framework

arXiv 2607.10380 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce CAFE (Compound-AI Factorial Evaluation), an open-source platform that brings design of experiments to the evaluation of compound AI systems (CAIS). Such systems expose many interchangeable choices - e.g. which retriever, model, or prompt - and practitioners rarely know which of them most affects answer quality. With CAFE, a practitioner registers each swappable component of a pipeline as a factor to build a factorial design over the chosen factors, run the resulting configurations, and score the answers on a shared rubric using a configurable LLM judge together with human raters. From these ratings it attributes answer-quality variance to the components and their interactions with mixed-effects models and reports effect sizes, significance, the best configuration, cost and latency trade-offs, and judge-human reliability. Whereas existing tools mostly either search for a good configuration or score outputs in isolation, CAFE also explains which component drives quality and whether an observed difference is significant. We validate CAFE on a retrieval-augmented question-answering (QA) pipeline over the HotpotQA benchmark dataset, where it recovers planted factor effects and stays calibrated under a permutation null. CAFE is released as a Python package and as a Web application.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

Builds on

25 of 58 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  5. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
  6. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  7. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 265
  8. 2024Non-Determinism of "Deterministic" LLM Settingscited by 92
  9. 2024AutoEval Done Right: Using Synthetic Data for Model Evaluationcited by 57
  10. 2025Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworkscited by 38
  11. 2025Optimizing Model Selection for Compound AI Systemscited by 36
  12. 2025Validating LLM-as-a-Judge Systems under Rating Indeterminacycited by 25
13 more
  1. 2025Judge's Verdict: A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM Judge Capability Through Human Agreementcited by 25
  2. 2025Optimas: Optimizing Compound AI Systems with Globally Aligned Local Rewardscited by 24
  3. 2025HiBayES: A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Framework for AI Evaluation Statisticscited by 18
  4. 2025Faster, Cheaper, Better: Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization for LLM and RAG Systemscited by 12
  5. 2025Adaptive Prediction-Powered AutoEval with Reliability and Efficiency Guaranteescited by 11
  6. 2026Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Pipelines Distorts Annotation, Evaluation, and Benchmarkingcited by 10
  7. 2025RAGSmith: A Framework for Finding the Optimal Composition of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Methods Across Datasetscited by 5
  8. 2025On The Reproducibility Limitations of RAG Systemscited by 3
  9. 2026Within-Model vs Between-Prompt Variability in Large Language Models for Creative Taskscited by 3
  10. 2026From XAI to Stories: A Factorial Study of LLM-Generated Explanation Qualitycited by 2
  11. 2026Better Assumptions, Stronger Conclusions: The Case for Ordinal Regression in HCIcited by 2
  12. 2026QUIVER: A Formal Framework for Quantifying Perturbation Propagation and Bifurcation in Compound AI Systemscited by 2
  13. 2026SETA: Statistical Fault Attribution for Compound AI Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions
  2. 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
  3. 2026MemDelta: Controlled Baselines and Hidden Confounds in Agent Memory Evaluation
  4. 2025PRISM: Agentic Retrieval with LLMs for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  5. 2026DAREBench: Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents
  6. 2025Can we Evaluate RAGs with Synthetic Data?
  7. 2025Collective Reasoning Among LLMs: A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth
  8. 2024TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains