mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Better Assumptions, Stronger Conclusions: The Case for Ordinal Regression in HCI

arXiv 2602.18660 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026stat.ME cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the widespread use of ordinal measures in HCI, such as Likert-items, there is little consensus among HCI researchers on the statistical methods used for analysing such data. Both parametric and non-parametric methods have been extensively used within the discipline, with limited reflection on their assumptions and appropriateness for such analyses. In this paper, we examine recent HCI works that report statistical analyses of ordinal measures. We highlight prevalent methods used, discuss their limitations and spotlight key assumptions and oversights that diminish the insights drawn from these methods. Finally, we champion and detail the use of cumulative link (mixed) models (CLM/CLMM) for analysing ordinal data. Further, we provide practical worked examples of applying CLM/CLMMs using R to published open-sourced datasets. This work contributes towards a better understanding of the statistical methods used to analyse ordinal data in HCI and helps to consolidate practices for future work.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.