A Symbolic Neural CPU for Quantization-Simulated Writeback and Interpretable Program Execution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks can learn algorithmic input-output mappings, but trusting a learned executor requires more than a correct final answer because the state transitions that produce it are usually hidden. To make those transitions visible, we introduce a trace-supervised symbolic neural CPU, a factorized learned execution architecture that combines recurrent control, an explicit operation router over a fixed differentiable arithmetic-logic unit bank, destination-masked register writeback, complete trajectory supervision and matched fixed-point replay. The model exposes the selected operation, source and destination registers, register trajectory, memory signals and writeback semantics at every step. On the principal 16-wide benchmark, the non-quantized executor reproduces reference execution exactly, while the eight-bit quantization-simulated executor preserves the symbolic operation path through programs of 1,000 instructions. When the same execution is evaluated against a matched fixed-point replay, the residual numerical drift disappears, showing that it comes from a mismatch between continuous and low-precision reference semantics rather than from execution failure. We compare recurrent, Transformer, temporal-convolution, temporal graph-inspired and state-space controllers, and the ablations show that operation-gate supervision is necessary for an inspectable execution path. Hidden-opcode memory-pressure tasks expose the remaining limits in delayed state use and temporal binding. We also extend the interface with ValueMemory, hybrid adaptive leaky integrate-and-fire controllers, candidate-constrained symbolic control trained through behaviour cloning and actor-critic reinforcement learning, and an RV32I base-integer semantic bridge. Together, these results establish a trace-verifiable framework for interpretable, low-precision and controllable neural execution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 61 references.
References · 30
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
- 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
- 2019Learned Step Size Quantizationcited by 628
- 2015BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagationscited by 592
- 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2018Quantizing deep convolutional networks for efficient inference: A whitepapercited by 521
- 2014Memory Networkscited by 363
- 2015Neural GPUs Learn Algorithmscited by 121
- 2014Learning to Executecited by 106
18 more
- 2015Neural Programmer-Interpreterscited by 101
- 2015Neural Programmer: Inducing Latent Programs with Gradient Descentcited by 34
- 2015Neural Random-Access Machinescited by 34
- 2024Transformers meet Neural Algorithmic Reasonerscited by 13
- 2025Tropical Attention: Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Combinatorial Algorithmscited by 12
- 2026MemMA: Coordinating the Memory Cycle through Multi-Agent Reasoning and In-Situ Self-Evolutioncited by 12
- 2026When Continual Learning Moves to Memory: A Study of Experience Reuse in LLM Agentscited by 10
- 2025Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 9
- 2025Code Simulation as a Proxy for High-order Tasks in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026Gradient-Based Program Synthesis with Neurally Interpreted Languagescited by 5
- 2025Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Hypergraphs with Looped Transformerscited by 4
- 2024Open-Book Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Neural Computerscited by 3
- 2025FeNN: A RISC-V vector processor for Spiking Neural Network accelerationcited by 2
- 2024Constraint Guided Model Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025KNARsack: Teaching Neural Algorithmic Reasoners to Solve Pseudo-Polynomial Problemscited by 1
- 2025Rescaling-Aware Training for Efficient Deployment of Deep Learning Models on Full-Integer Hardwarecited by 1
- 2026Transformers are Stateless Differentiable Neural Computerscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Neuro-Symbolic Computer Use: Learning Reusable Policies for Reliable and Efficient Execution
- 2026Teaching LLMs Program Semantics via Symbolic Execution Traces
- 2026Agentic Planning for Symbolic Execution
- 2026ISA-Bench: A Benchmark for Computational Reasoning Across Instruction Set Architectures
- 2026Good to Go: The LOOP Skill Engine That Hits 99% Success and Slashes Token Usage by 99% via One-Shot Recording and Deterministic Replay
- 2026Weights to Code: Extracting Interpretable Algorithms from the Discrete Transformer
- 2026LeanPolish: Verified Supervision for Lean Proof Compression
- 2026Clover: A Neural-Symbolic Agentic Harness with Stochastic Tree-of-Thoughts for Verified RTL Repair