mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?

arXiv 2607.09996 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.MAcited by 11

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated failure attribution uses LLMs to identify where and why agentic systems fail. As agents become more capable, their failures become subtler, making automated attribution increasingly important. We introduce Who&When Pro, a large-scale benchmark for automated failure attribution in agentic systems. Using a strictly controlled pipeline that injects a failure only after exactly replaying a successful prefix, we construct 12,326 failed trajectories with golden labels across 3 modalities and 26 benchmarks covering various scenarios. Beyond benchmarking, we conduct extensive experiments and analyses, revealing systematic patterns in how models attribute failures across modalities, protocols, and model families, and providing empirical guidance for future automated failure attribution systems.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 83 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

83 of 115 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses28 Apr
  2. 2026Synthetic Sandbox for Training Machine Learning Engineering Agents6 Apr
  3. 2026ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics12 Mar
  4. 2026AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories2 Feb
  5. 2025Live-SWE-agent: Can Software Engineering Agents Self-Evolve on the Fly?17 Nov
  6. 2025Understanding Code Agent Behaviour: An Empirical Study of Success and Failure Trajectories31 Oct
  7. 2025Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution6 Oct
  8. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures29 Sep
  9. 2025CORRECT: COndensed eRror RECognition via knowledge Transfer in multi-agent systems28 Sep
  10. 2025Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis17 Sep
  11. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
  12. 2025Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling31 Jul
5 more
  1. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems30 Apr
  2. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  3. 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents1 Jul
  4. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  5. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug

Other references · 66

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  8. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  9. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  10. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  11. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  12. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
38 more
  1. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  2. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  3. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  4. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  5. 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
  6. 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
  7. 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
  8. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 246
  9. 2024Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 235
  10. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
  11. 2025EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agentscited by 213
  12. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systemscited by 177
  13. 2024TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answeringcited by 127
  14. 2025Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systemscited by 125
  15. 2024AgentTrek: Agent Trajectory Synthesis via Guiding Replay with Web Tutorialscited by 123
  16. 2026CoEvoSkills: Self-Evolving Agent Skills via Co-Evolutionary Verificationcited by 117
  17. 2025WebWatcher: Breaking New Frontier of Vision-Language Deep Research Agentcited by 114
  18. 2024AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agentscited by 110
  19. 2025ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answeringcited by 105
  20. 2024MMSearch: Benchmarking the Potential of Large Models as Multi-modal Search Enginescited by 98
  21. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agentscited by 96
  22. 2025Deep Video Discovery: Agentic Search with Tool Use for Long-form Video Understandingcited by 94
  23. 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 92
  24. 2025AgentAuditor: Human-Level Safety and Security Evaluation for LLM Agentscited by 82
  25. 2024Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teamscited by 81
  26. 2025Agent-R: Training Language Model Agents to Reflect via Iterative Self-Trainingcited by 74
  27. 2023MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agentscited by 67
  28. 2025Nemotron-Research-Tool-N1: Exploring Tool-Using Language Models with Reinforced Reasoningcited by 67
  29. 2025SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agentscited by 66
  30. 2026AutoHarness: improving LLM agents by automatically synthesizing a code harnesscited by 63
  31. 2025Multi-Agent Evolve: LLM Self-Improve through Co-evolutioncited by 58
  32. 2024DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 57
  33. 2026Natural-Language Agent Harnessescited by 54
  34. 2025Simulating Environments with Reasoning Models for Agent Trainingcited by 52
  35. 2025AgentRefine: Enhancing Agent Generalization through Refinement Tuningcited by 51
  36. 2024Offline Training of Language Model Agents with Functions as Learnable Weightscited by 47
  37. 2025SimpleQA Verified: A Reliable Factuality Benchmark to Measure Parametric Knowledgecited by 44
  38. 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 44

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2026Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation
  3. 2026Adaptive Influence Graphs for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2026VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026Tracing Agentic Failure from the Flow of Success
  6. 2026StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2026Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search