Argus: Reorchestrating Static Analysis via a Multi-Agent Ensemble for Full-Chain Security Vulnerability Detection
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked interest in their application to Static Application Security Testing (SAST), primarily due to their superior contextual reasoning capabilities compared to traditional symbolic or rule-based methods. However, existing LLM-based approaches typically attempt to replace human experts directly without integrating effectively with existing SAST tools. This lack of integration results in ineffectiveness, including high rates of false positives, hallucinations, limited reasoning depth, and excessive token usage, making them impractical for industrial deployment. To overcome these limitations, we present a paradigm shift that reorchestrates the SAST workflow from current LLM-assisted structure to a new LLM-centered workflow. We introduce Argus (Agentic and Retrieval-Augmented Guarding System), the first multi-agent framework designed specifically for vulnerability detection. Argus incorporates three key novelties: comprehensive supply chain analysis, collaborative multi-agent workflows, and the integration of state-of-the-art techniques such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and ReAct to minimize hallucinations and enhance reasoning. Extensive empirical evaluation demonstrates that Argus significantly outperforms existing methods by detecting a higher volume of true vulnerabilities while simultaneously reducing false positives and operational costs. Notably, Argus has identified several critical zero-day vulnerabilities with CVE assignments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 10
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failurescited by 133
- 2024IRIS: LLM-Assisted Static Analysis for Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 103
- 2023Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 59
- 2025RepoAudit: An Autonomous LLM-Agent for Repository-Level Code Auditingcited by 49
- 2025From CVE Entries to Verifiable Exploits: An Automated Multi-Agent Framework for Reproducing CVEscited by 18
- 2022Detecting False Alarms from Automatic Static Analysis Tools: How Far are We?cited by 17
- 2024LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detectioncited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Let the Trial Begin: A Mock-Court Approach to Vulnerability Detection using LLM-Based Agents
- 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
- 2026TitanCA: Lessons from Orchestrating LLM Agents to Discover 100+ CVEs
- 2026Can Open-Source LLM Agents Replace Static Application Security Testing Tools? An Empirical Assessment
- 2026Multi-Agent Taint Specification Extraction for Vulnerability Detection
- 2026A Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Exploit Generation with Constraint-Guided Comprehension and Reflection
- 2026Beyond Predefined Sinks: Security-Aware Dependency Analysis for LLM Agents
- 2026Code-Augur: Agentic Vulnerability Detection via Specification Inference