mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Event Burst Trigger: An Availability Backdoor Attack on Event-Based SNN Object Detection

arXiv 2607.09115 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Event-based vision and spiking neural networks (SNNs) are increasingly adopted for edge intelligence under strict latency and energy constraints. However, the vulnerability of event-based SNN object detection models to availability backdoor attacks remains insufficiently studied. This paper presents Event Burst Trigger (EBT), an availability backdoor attack targeting SNN-based object detection models. EBT injects carefully crafted event-based triggers into the training data, which induce temporally concentrated event streams during inference. These burst-like activations increase the number of phantom (i.e., spurious) object candidates, and consequently inflate the computational cost of the post-processing stage, particularly Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). We evaluate EBT on SpikeYOLO, the state-of-the-art SNN-based object detector, under a poison-only threat model that does not require modifications to the model architecture, loss function, or inference pipeline. Experimental results show that while detection accuracy remains largely preserved, with [email protected] decreasing by less than 0.099, the latency of the NMS stage increases by up to 38%. This indicates that NMS can become a dominant availability bottleneck in event-based SNN object detection. Experiments on an edge platform further show that the proposed attack elevates baseline resource utilization and reduces scheduling slack without inducing conspicuous peaks in resource usage. In addition, STRIP-based backdoor detection fails to reliably distinguish the proposed attack from benign inputs. These results characterize a previously underexplored availability backdoor threat in event-based SNN object detection systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  2. 2019Event-based Vision: A Surveycited by 1,010
  3. 2019STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 437
  4. 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 399
  5. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  6. 2017Learning non-maximum suppressioncited by 112
  7. 2020A Large Scale Event-based Detection Dataset for Automotivecited by 108
  8. 2020Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 108
  9. 2024Integer-Valued Training and Spike-Driven Inference Spiking Neural Network for High-performance and Energy-efficient Object Detectioncited by 65
  10. 2021HIRE-SNN: Harnessing the Inherent Robustness of Energy-Efficient Deep Spiking Neural Networks by Training with Crafted Input Noisecited by 61
  11. 2018Fast and Efficient Information Transmission with Burst Spikes in Deep Spiking Neural Networkscited by 34
  12. 2022Phantom Sponges: Exploiting Non-Maximum Suppression to Attack Deep Object Detectorscited by 28
4 more
  1. 2023Robotic Vision for Human-Robot Interaction and Collaboration: A Survey and Systematic Reviewcited by 25
  2. 2023Overload: Latency Attacks on Object Detection for Edge Devicescited by 13
  3. 2023SparseProp: Efficient Event-Based Simulation and Training of Sparse Recurrent Spiking Neural Networkscited by 6
  4. 2025Adversarial Attacks on Event-Based Pedestrian Detectors: A Physical Approachcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.