A Unified Detection Framework for AI-Related Content and Artifacts
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a double-edged sword: while it has achieved remarkable success across a wide range of domains, its deployment also calls for effective oversight and regulation, for which the detection of AI-related content and artifacts is perhaps the most direct and cost-effective approach. To this end, we propose a unified detection framework based on Mahalanobis distance scores (MDS), applicable to several important settings, including the detection of large language model (LLM) generated text, hallucination, watermark, and adversarial examples. A key component of the proposed method is to accurately characterize the positive class--such as human-generated text, factual statements, unwatermarked text, or non-adversarial samples--which requires an efficient and robust estimator of the covariance matrix of deep representations of positive samples before computing the MDS. Since the positive samples typically consist of multiple classes, and these classes may exhibit both homogeneity and heterogeneity, we develop joint estimation methods for both the casewise and cellwise minimum covariance determinant (MCD) estimators. We provide efficient optimization algorithms for both estimators and prove their convergence. We provide a reasonable definition of the breakdown point for the joint estimators and prove their corresponding high breakdown point properties. Empirical evaluations confirm the effectiveness of the proposed detection framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.
Builds on
24 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules1 Apr
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan
Other references · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
10 more
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 341
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 66
- 2022The Cellwise Minimum Covariance Determinant Estimatorcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Perplexity: Character Distribution Signatures and the MDTA Benchmark for AI Text Detection
- 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
- 2026Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions
- 2025A Practical Synthesis of Detecting AI-Generated Textual, Visual, and Audio Content
- 2026GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Texts
- 2024DUPE: Detection Undermining via Prompt Engineering for Deepfake Text
- 2025Kill two birds with one stone: generalized and robust AI-generated text detection via dynamic perturbations
- 2025Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM