Beyond Modality Fusion: Deep Ensembles for Multimodal Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multimodal classification, late-fusion approaches classify concatenated modality-specific features extracted by unimodal neural networks. When modality imbalance is pronounced, various regularization techniques have been proposed to balance the learning process and overcome the inferior performance of late-fusion networks. In contrast, this work demonstrates that multimodal data can be effectively classified without any explicit modality fusion, using deep ensembles of unimodal networks. We systematically compare deep ensembles to late-fusion networks at equal parameter count and show that ensembles consistently outperform state-of-the-art late-fusion methods designed to address modality imbalance. This advantage also holds over intermediate-fusion techniques we evaluated and over hybrid methods that combine unimodal and multimodal predictions. We propose and empirically validate a method for selecting the number of models per modality in an ensemble, avoiding computationally expensive exhaustive search. Under extreme modality imbalance and small ensemble sizes, the heuristic indicates that ensembles of unimodal models trained solely on the stronger modality are preferable; as the ensemble scales up, incorporating models from the weaker modality becomes beneficial. Both predictions align with our empirical findings. To systematically explore the challenges of optimizing multimodal models, we propose a synthetic multimodal framework that allows control over both the number of modalities and their predictive strength; our findings are consistent across synthetic and real-world datasets. Finally, by fitting scaling laws to bimodal datasets, we estimate the asymptotic performance of ensembles.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.
Builds on
26 of 34 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
- 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
14 more
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
- 2020Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networkscited by 296
- 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 258
- 2023Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphscited by 166
- 2022Self-Consistent Dynamical Field Theory of Kernel Evolution in Wide Neural Networkscited by 104
- 2023Tensor Programs VI: Feature Learning in Infinite-Depth Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2023Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limitcited by 64
- 2024How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset sizecited by 42
- 2024On the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphscited by 36
- 2022Generalized Laplacian Positional Encoding for Graph Representation Learningcited by 21
- 2024Towards Neural Scaling Laws on Graphscited by 13
- 2024Even Sparser Graph Transformerscited by 12
- 2026Hyperparameter Transfer with Mixture-of-Expert Layerscited by 10
- 2023Principles for Initialization and Architecture Selection in Graph Neural Networks with ReLU Activationscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.