Strategic Buying Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic AI is shifting online shopping from search toward delegated purchasing, where autonomous buying agents monitor markets and decide when to buy on a consumer's behalf. We study the design of such strategic buying agents, which must decide when to purchase within a finite shopping window, translating price observations, the remaining time horizon, and beliefs about future price changes into a purchase policy. We formulate this problem across three information regimes: stationary, Bayesian, and robust, and treat the resulting optimal policies as a policy menu for implementation. In the stationary regime, price adjustments follow a Poisson arrival process with a known post-adjustment price distribution; the optimal policy is a dynamic purchase-threshold rule, with the threshold governed by an ordinary differential equation. In the Bayesian regime, the adjustment intensity is known, but the price-adjustment distribution is uncertain; the optimal rule remains threshold-based, now depending on posterior beliefs, and we bound the value of knowing the true distribution. In the robust regime, the agent has only price bounds and seeks worst-case protection; randomized threshold policies achieve optimal competitive-ratio and minimax-regret guarantees. We evaluate the proposed policies on Amazon price histories from Keepa (367 items, 48,933 timestamped observations) and examine their integration into language-model buying agents. The stationary and Bayesian policies perform competitively on mean normalized consumer surplus despite their stylized assumptions, while the robust policy performs best at the distribution's 10th percentile. Results suggest language models are better suited to selecting among regimes and calibration samples than to making buy-or-wait decisions directly.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.
Builds on
4 of 68 references.
References · 4
- 2025What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commercecited by 22
- 2025Large Language Models for Supply Chain Decisionscited by 13
- 2026AI Agents for Inventory Control: Human-LLM-OR Complementaritycited by 8
- 2026A Solicit-Then-Suggest Model of Agentic Purchasingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Shopping by algorithm: How agentic AI deploys human heuristics as a surrogate consumer
- 2026Reasonably reasoning AI agents can avoid game-theoretic failures in zero-shot, provably
- 2026Can LLM Agents Price Competitively? A Dynamic Multi-Attribute Auction Benchmark for Agentic Commerce
- 2026Learning to Sell: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Large Language Model Agents in Multi-Product Markets
- 2025Reinforcement Learning-Based Market Making as a Stochastic Control on Non-Stationary Limit Order Book Dynamics
- 2025Online Learning for Dynamic Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Mechanism in Unknown Environments
- 2026Agentic Limit Order Books: Phase Transitions and Market Impact
- 2024Algorithmic Collusion And The Minimum Price Markov Game ↗