mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HAS-Bench: Evaluating LLM-Based Human-Agent Systems under Configurable Human Participation

arXiv 2607.04329 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models increasingly operate in settings where humans are active collaborators rather than passive task providers. We introduce HAS-Framework, a graph-based framework that represents humans and LLM-powered agents as first-class participants with explicit roles, permissions, communication paths, and action authority. Building on this framework, HAS-Bench evaluates Human-Agent Systems under configurable human participation across agency levels, interaction channels, and persona policies. The benchmark measures both task outcomes and process-level collaboration behavior, including clarification quality, feedback utilization, control calibration, safety, initiative, and interaction cost. Experiments across six domains show that human participation can substantially improve task completion and failure recovery, but the gains depend on when, how, and by whom human input is exercised.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MASEval: Extending Multi-Agent Evaluation from Models to Systems9 Mar
  2. 2025LLM-Based Human-Agent Collaboration and Interaction Systems: A Survey1 May
  3. 2025Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions3 Apr
  4. 2025Active Task Disambiguation with LLMs6 Feb
  5. 2024Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration20 Dec
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun

Other references · 11

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  3. 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agentscited by 306
  4. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 170
  5. 2025Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. Workforcecited by 38
  6. 2025RECODE-H: A Benchmark for Research Code Development with Interactive Human Feedbackcited by 25
  7. 2025ConvCodeWorld: Benchmarking Conversational Code Generation in Reproducible Feedback Environmentscited by 14
  8. 2026When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigationcited by 14
  9. 2025FinArena: A Human-Agent Collaboration Framework for Financial Market Analysis and Forecastingcited by 8
  10. 2025ManagerBench: Evaluating the Safety-Pragmatism Trade-off in Autonomous LLMscited by 6
  11. 2025AgentChangeBench: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework for Goal-Shift Robustness in Conversational AIcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Through the Lens of Human-Human Collaboration: A Configurable Research Platform for Exploring Human-Agent Collaboration
  2. 2026From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-Agent Collaboration: A Vision, Design Philosophy, and an Empirical Framework for Achieving Successful Partnerships Between Humans and LLM Agents
  3. 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy
  4. 2025The Social Laboratory: A Psychometric Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation
  5. 2024Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams
  6. 2024Your Co-Workers Matter: Evaluating Collaborative Capabilities of Language Models in Blocks World
  7. 2025Collaborate, Deliberate, Evaluate: How LLM Alignment Affects Coordinated Multi-Agent Outcomes
  8. 2026CollabSim: A CSCW-Grounded Methodology for Investigating Collaborative Competence of LLM Agents through Controlled Multi-Agent Experiments