mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Features Mining via Activation Geometry

arXiv 2607.04222 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability methods aim to reveal the features represented inside large language models (LLMs). Many existing methods begin with labeled examples of a human-defined concept that may reflect human biases, and then identify how that concept is represented within the model, for example in its activation space or through other decomposition methods. We introduce Mining via Activation Geometry (MAG), a simple unsupervised framework for extracting reasoning features from model activations by prepending the same natural-language instruction Q to every input p, where Q defines the reasoning feature of interest, such as ``Can this object be found in the desert?'' or ``Is this prompt malicious?'' We measure how the instruction changes the model's internal representation using m(Q mid p) - m(p) at a single readout point. We explore eight different MAGs. The extracted reasoning features predict the models' own world understanding and judgment, can be approximated into a single activation direction, we found that some features are more linearly represented and some less, this linear representation, which is vector steering, can change the LLMs' decisions through activation steering by injecting reasoning features. Finally, we use the same method to select the best training datasets for prompt-injection classifier probes: while similarity between ordinary activations is almost unrelated to downstream performance, RFD-based similarity achieves 94.7% Top-1 and 100% Top-2 accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  5. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  6. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  7. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
  8. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  9. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
  10. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
  11. 2024Looking Inward: Language Models Can Learn About Themselves by Introspectioncited by 113
  12. 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 95
12 more
  1. 2026Emergent Introspective Awareness in Large Language Modelscited by 82
  2. 2024Sabotage Evaluations for Frontier Modelscited by 52
  3. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 52
  4. 2025Steering Evaluation-Aware Language Models to Act Like They Are Deployedcited by 35
  5. 2025A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability for Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 34
  6. 2025Jailbreak Attack Initializations as Extractors of Compliance Directionscited by 10
  7. 2025Silenced Biases: The Dark Side LLMs Learned to Refusecited by 10
  8. 2025Activation Steering for Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 9
  9. 2026Mechanisms of Introspective Awarenesscited by 7
  10. 2026Mirage Probes: How Vision Models Fake Visual Understandingcited by 5
  11. 2026Internal-State Probes Read the Situation, Not the Action: Three Negative Results for Pre-Action Misalignment Monitoringcited by 2
  12. 2026Extracting Recurring Vulnerabilities from Black-Box LLM-Generated Softwarecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Hypothesis-Driven Feature Manifold Analysis in LLMs via Supervised Multi-Dimensional Scaling
  2. 2025Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning Process
  3. 2026Beyond Linear Concepts: Discovering and Aligning Non-Linear Concept Manifolds in Large Language Models
  4. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2025ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation Spaces
  6. 2025REMA: A Unified Reasoning Manifold Framework for Interpreting Large Language Model
  7. 2026Truth as a Trajectory: What Internal Representations Reveal About Large Language Model Reasoning
  8. 2026Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretability