Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning Process
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the growing reasoning capabilities of recent large language models (LLMs), their internal mechanisms during the reasoning process remain underexplored. Prior approaches often rely on human-defined concepts (e.g., overthinking, reflection) at the word level to analyze reasoning in a supervised manner. However, such methods are limited, as it is infeasible to capture the full spectrum of potential reasoning behaviors, many of which are difficult to define in token space. In this work, we propose an unsupervised framework (namely, RISE: Reasoning behavior Interpretability via Sparse auto-Encoder) for discovering reasoning vectors, which we define as directions in the activation space that encode distinct reasoning behaviors. By segmenting chain-of-thought traces into sentence-level 'steps' and training sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) on step-level activations, we uncover disentangled features corresponding to interpretable behaviors such as reflection and backtracking. Visualization and clustering analyses show that these behaviors occupy separable regions in the decoder column space. Moreover, targeted interventions on SAE-derived vectors can controllably amplify or suppress specific reasoning behaviors, altering inference trajectories without retraining. Beyond behavior-specific disentanglement, SAEs capture structural properties such as response length, revealing clusters of long versus short reasoning traces. More interestingly, SAEs enable the discovery of novel behaviors beyond human supervision. We demonstrate the ability to control response confidence by identifying confidence-related vectors in the SAE decoder space. These findings underscore the potential of unsupervised latent discovery for both interpreting and controllably steering reasoning in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2025.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Resa: Transparent Reasoning Models via SAEs11 Jun
- 2025Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report30 Apr
Other references · 33
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 540
21 more
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 463
- 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 373
- 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 283
- 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Modelscited by 217
- 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 199
- 2025Deep Think with Confidencecited by 199
- 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 162
- 2025Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Spacecited by 109
- 2023Word Embeddings Are Steers for Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectorscited by 69
- 2025SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Freecited by 65
- 2024Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning with Certaindexcited by 56
- 2025Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Manifold Steeringcited by 32
- 2025Reasoning-Finetuning Repurposes Latent Representations in Base Modelscited by 23
- 2025Overclocking LLM Reasoning: Monitoring and Controlling Thinking Path Lengths in LLMscited by 22
- 2023PanGu-π: Enhancing Language Model Architectures via Nonlinearity Compensationcited by 17
- 2025ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Modelscited by 17
- 2025SLOT: Sample-specific Language Model Optimization at Test-timecited by 17
- 2025Differentially Private Steering for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 15
- 2025On Reasoning Strength Planning in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?cited by 11
- 2026Triggering Chain-of-Thought via Latent Feature Interventions in Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Do LLMs Know Their Vulnerable Scenarios?cited by 0
- 2026Do LLMs Know Their Vulnerable Scenarios?26 Jul 2026
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Models4 Jun 2026
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models20 Jan 2026
- 2026Triggering Chain-of-Thought via Latent Feature Interventions in Large Language Models12 Jan 2026
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?9 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When
- 2025Decoupling Understanding from Reasoning via Problem Space Mapping for Small-Scale Model Reasoning
- 2026PRISM: A Dual View of LLM Reasoning through Semantic Flow and Latent Computation
- 2025Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Time
- 2026UniCog: Uncovering Cognitive Abilities of LLMs through Latent Mind Space Analysis
- 2026Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention
- 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches