Are Existing Out-Of-Distribution Techniques Suitable for Network Intrusion Detection?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) has become increasingly popular in network intrusion detection. However, ML-based solutions always respond regardless of whether the input data reflects known patterns, a common issue across safety-critical applications. While several proposals exist for detecting Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) in other fields, it remains unclear whether these approaches can effectively identify new forms of intrusions for network security. New attacks, not necessarily affecting overall distributions, are not guaranteed to be clearly OOD as instead, images depicting new classes are in computer vision. In this work, we investigate whether existing OOD detectors from other fields allow the identification of unknown malicious traffic. We also explore whether more discriminative and semantically richer embedding spaces within models, such as those created with contrastive learning and multi-class tasks, benefit detection. Our investigation covers a set of six OOD techniques that employ different detection strategies. These techniques are applied to models trained in various ways and subsequently exposed to unknown malicious traffic from the same and different datasets (network environments). Our findings suggest that existing detectors can identify a consistent portion of new malicious traffic, and that improved embedding spaces enhance detection. We also demonstrate that simple combinations of certain detectors can identify almost 100% of malicious traffic in our tested scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.
Builds on
19 of 43 references.
References · 19
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 477
7 more
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2018Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 121
- 2018TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and Timecited by 108
- 2022Learn to Adapt: Robust Drift Detection in Security Domaincited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.