mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLAP: Closed-Loop Training, Evaluation, and Release Control for Domain Agent Post-training

arXiv 2607.01846 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Domain agents often face noisy business data, uncertain post-training gains, offline/application mismatch, and adapter-release risk. This paper presents CLAP (Closed-Loop Agent Post-training), a closed-loop method that converts business data into structured SFT samples, decision-preference samples, holdout sets, risk diagnostics, and release-gate records. CLAP combines data validation, target/evidence normalization, reward/KL diagnosis, offline gates, and application-chain replay to decide whether an adapter is suitable for the target application chain. On five anonymized manufacturing-scenario batches, QLoRA-style LoRA-SFT yields modest average gains: overall score increases by 0.0098, pass rate by 0.0240, and evidence accuracy by 0.0280, while hallucination and wrong facts decrease. Yet only 3 of 5 batches improve, some batches regress, and GRPO exposes high KL risks. Application-chain replay further shows that RAG is necessary for factual extraction; under the same 3B backbone and 100 replay cases, an application-RAG-oriented LoRA-SFT adapter improves value, core fields, and answer-evidence doc/page matching over base+RAG, but increases latency. These results support managing domain-agent post-training through an integrated data-training-evaluation-release loop rather than relying on training completion or a single offline score.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 17 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  7. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  8. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  9. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  10. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  11. 2024RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAGcited by 258
  12. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 89
3 more
  1. 2024A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 77
  2. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Large Models: A Survey of Methodologiescited by 44
  3. 2025LaMDAgent: An Autonomous Framework for Post-Training Pipeline Optimization via LLM Agentscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RSIBench-Data: Benchmarking Data-Centric Research for Recursive Self-Improvement
  2. 2026STOCKTAKE: Measuring the Gap Between Perception and Action in LLM Agents with a Fair Oracle
  3. 2026Agent Error Dataset: Scaling 50,000 Error--Diagnosis Pairs for Failure Analysis and Error-Aware Post-Training
  4. 2026Long SKILL Compliance as Logical Reasoning: Closure-Grounded Detection with Scaling-Guided On-Policy Distillation
  5. 2026AV-AIVAT: 74x Cheaper Agent Evaluation with Certified Anytime-Valid Stopping in Imperfect-Information Games
  6. 2026SkillSeek: Revisiting Agent Skill Retrieval at Marketplace Scale
  7. 2026Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
  8. 2026Trains but Doesn't Learn: A Post-Training Delivery Benchmark for LLM Agents as Forward-Deployed Engineers