Actual causality in fault trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fault trees are a widely used as effective risk models for complex systems, answering the question "what can go wrong?", especially through minimal cut set analysis. We study fault trees from the perspective of Halpern & Pearl's theory of actual causality. This allows us to use fault trees to answer the question "why has it gone wrong?", which is fundamental to failure diagnostics. We give a complete classification of each of the different notions of actual causality in terms of the fault tree's graph structure and logical structure, and show how minimal cut sets give rise to actual causes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 45 references.
References · 7
- 2022A Causal Analysis of Harmcited by 15
- 2022Causality in Configurable Software Systemscited by 13
- 2014The Computational Complexity of Structure-Based Causalitycited by 12
- 2013Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach --- Part 1: Causescited by 6
- 2022Efficient and Generic Algorithms for Quantitative Attack Tree Analysiscited by 3
- 2024Intervention and Conditioning in Causal Bayesian Networkscited by 3
- 2022BDDs Strike Back: Efficient Analysis of Static and Dynamic Fault Treescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.