mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

BDDs Strike Back: Efficient Analysis of Static and Dynamic Fault Trees

arXiv 2202.02829 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2022cs.SEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fault trees are a key model in reliability analysis. Classical static fault trees (SFT) can best be analysed using binary decision diagrams (BDD). State-based techniques are favorable for the more expressive dynamic fault trees (DFT). This paper combines the best of both worlds by following Dugan's approach: dynamic sub-trees are analysed via model checking Markov models and replaced by basic events capturing the obtained failure probabilities. The resulting SFT is then analysed via BDDs. We implemented this approach in the Storm model checker. Extensive experiments (a) compare our pure BDD-based analysis of SFTs to various existing SFT analysis tools, (b) indicate the benefits of our efficient calculations for multiple time points and the assessment of the mean-time-to-failure, and (c) show that our implementation of Dugan's approach significantly outperforms pure Markovian analysis of DFTs. Our implementation Storm-dft is currently the only tool supporting efficient analysis for both SFTs and DFTs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.