Repair the Amplifier, Not the Symptom: Stable World-Model Correction for Agent Rollouts
On the map: World models → World models for language agents
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Long-horizon language agents increasingly maintain executable world models in the form of planning graphs, where tool calls, validators, memory updates, recovery branches, and final answers are connected by typed dependencies. When a rollout fails, repairing the most visible error can leave the underlying error-amplification path intact, while replaying the full graph is expensive and difficult for long-context models to use reliably. We study world-model correction: selecting a compact subgraph of a failed planning graph whose repair stabilizes subsequent rollouts. We first instantiate a strong family of engineering correctors, including pointwise error scans, TopK and window selection, local graph expansion, cascade repair, and full-context LLM repair. We then propose WM-SAR, a spectral subgraph repair method that estimates node-edge amplification, greedily grows a connected repair region by marginal residual-spectral relief, and sends only this region to an LLM for root-cause repair. Theoretically, we connect residual spectral radius to rollout error and planning regret, motivating repair as stabilization rather than attribution alone. Across synthetic calling-tree graphs, benchmark-inspired agent topologies, and cross-model LLM repair experiments, WM-SAR achieves stronger long-horizon stabilization and root-cause recovery under compact token budgets, matching much larger repair contexts while exposing the LLM to a cleaner causal subgraph.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 12 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 319
- 2023RestGPT: Connecting Large Language Models with Real-World RESTful APIscited by 129
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026AgentTether: Graph-Guided Diagnosis and Runtime Intervention for Reliable LLM Agent Operation
- 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
- 2026Verify, Repair, Repeat, or Stop? Robust Stopping for Noisy Verify-Repair Loops in LLM Agents
- 2026From Faulty Memories to Corrected Actions: Dependency-Guided Rollback Repair for Memory-Augmented Agents
- 2026Rollback the World, Keep the Reflection: Rollback-Induced Reflection for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
- 2026Structured Feedback Improves Repair in an LLM Agent Loop
- 2026RESKILL: Explicit Failure Attribution and Structured Repair for Interactive Language Agents