The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Counting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length n, where each 1 corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. For fixed privacy parameters, the standard binary tree mechanism achieves expected ℓ_∞ error O(log3/2 n) under approximate differential privacy and O(log2 n) under pure differential privacy. Whether these dependences on the stream length are necessary has remained a central open problem. For fixed varepsilon∈(0,1), we prove a lower bound of Omega(log3/2 n) under approximate DP with sufficiently small fixed δ>0, and a lower bound of Omega(log2 n) under pure DP. These bounds establish the optimality of the binary tree mechanism in both settings. The bounds hold for arbitrary mechanisms, even when the entire stream is available in advance. Both proofs use the same decomposition and accumulation of residual noise along a tree. As a consequence of the approximate-DP bound, we also obtain a largest-possible separation between hereditary discrepancy and private ℓ_∞ error for linear queries, showing that the known general upper bound in terms of hereditary discrepancy has the optimal dependence on the number of queries.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
- 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
- 2017The Price of Differential Privacy For Online Learningcited by 44
- 2021The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual Observationcited by 32
- 2022Almost Tight Error Bounds on Differentially Private Continual Countingcited by 25
- 2022Constant matters: Fine-grained Complexity of Differentially Private Continual Observationcited by 23
- 2023Correlated Noise Provably Beats Independent Noise for Differentially Private Learningcited by 23
- 2023A Unifying Framework for Differentially Private Sums under Continual Observationcited by 15
- 2014Factorization Norms and Hereditary Discrepancycited by 14
- 2021Differentially Private Algorithms for Graphs Under Continual Observationcited by 12
- 2024Lower Bounds for Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation and Online Threshold Queriescited by 11
- 2022On Differentially Private Counting on Treescited by 7
5 more
- 2023Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model with Differential Privacy under Continual Observationcited by 4
- 2021CountSketches, Feature Hashing and the Median of Threecited by 2
- 2024Continual Counting with Gradual Privacy Expirationcited by 2
- 2024Private Counting of Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model and Extensionscited by 1
- 2025Differentially Private Space-Efficient Algorithms for Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Modelcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.