Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model with Differential Privacy under Continual Observation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy is a central challenge for systems that learn from sensitive data sets, especially when a system's outputs must be continuously updated to reflect changing data. We consider the achievable error for differentially private continual release of a basic statistic - the number of distinct items - in a stream where items may be both inserted and deleted (the turnstile model). With only insertions, existing algorithms have additive error just polylogarithmic in the length of the stream T. We uncover a much richer landscape in the turnstile model, even without considering memory restrictions. We show that every differentially private mechanism that handles insertions and deletions has worst-case additive error at least T1/4 even under a relatively weak, event-level privacy definition. Then, we identify a parameter of the input stream, its maximum flippancy, that is low for natural data streams and for which we give tight parameterized error guarantees. Specifically, the maximum flippancy is the largest number of times that the contribution of a single item to the distinct elements count changes over the course of the stream. We present an item-level differentially private mechanism that, for all turnstile streams with maximum flippancy w, continually outputs the number of distinct elements with an O(√w · polylog T) additive error, without requiring prior knowledge of w. We prove that this is the best achievable error bound that depends only on w, for a large range of values of w. When w is small, the error of our mechanism is similar to the polylogarithmic in T error in the insertion-only setting, bypassing the hardness in the turnstile model.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024An Algorithm for Streaming Differentially Private Datacited by 2
- 2025Online Learning and Unlearningcited by 1
- 2026The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Countingcited by 1
- 2024Differentially Private Synthetic High-dimensional Tabular Streamcited by 0
- 2026Machine Unlearning as Private Retroactive Algorithmscited by 0
- 2026Machine Unlearning as Private Retroactive Algorithms4 Sep 2026
- 2026The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Counting1 Jul 2026
- 2025Online Learning and Unlearning13 May 2025
- 2024Differentially Private Synthetic High-dimensional Tabular Stream31 Aug 2024
- 2024An Algorithm for Streaming Differentially Private Data26 Jan 2024