mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Continual Counting with Gradual Privacy Expiration

arXiv 2406.03802 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differential privacy with gradual expiration models the setting where data items arrive in a stream and at a given time t the privacy loss guaranteed for a data item seen at time (t-d) is ε g(d), where g is a monotonically non-decreasing function. We study the fundamental textitcontinual (binary) counting problem where each data item consists of a bit, and the algorithm needs to output at each time step the sum of all the bits streamed so far. For a stream of length T and privacy textitwithout expiration continual counting is possible with maximum (over all time steps) additive error O(log2(T)/varepsilon) and the best known lower bound is Omega(log(T)/varepsilon); closing this gap is a challenging open problem. We show that the situation is very different for privacy with gradual expiration by giving upper and lower bounds for a large set of expiration functions g. Specifically, our algorithm achieves an additive error of O(log(T)/ε) for a large set of privacy expiration functions. We also give a lower bound that shows that if C is the additive error of any ε-DP algorithm for this problem, then the product of C and the privacy expiration function after 2C steps must be Omega(log(T)/ε). Our algorithm matches this lower bound as its additive error is O(log(T)/ε), even when g(2C) = O(1). Our empirical evaluation shows that we achieve a slowly growing privacy loss with significantly smaller empirical privacy loss for large values of d than a natural baseline algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.