REDI: Corpus Aware Patch Ranking for DINOv3 Token Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most token reduction methods for Vision Transformers seek favorable tradeoffs between accuracy and efficiency by pruning, merging, or pooling patch tokens. REDI (Relevance for DINOv3 Token Reduction) studies this question through a controlled supervised reference: how should a fixed token budget be allocated across patches for image classification? REDI quantizes final block DINOv3 patch representations into a visual vocabulary and derives class conditioned corpus scores using supervised TF-IDF over visual words. For each validation image, the ground truth class selects a row of the TF-IDF table, and four transformed views produce a TF-IDF map aligned to a reference center crop. A separate dense pass on the same crop provides an attention map. After independent min max normalization, their elementwise product defines the REDI score. A fixed keep, merge, and compress operator then uses score rank to assign patch roles and score magnitude to weight merging and compression. With precomputed REDI scores, a frozen DINOv3 ViT-B/16 backbone, and the same linear classifier used for dense evaluation, the operator reduces the sequence length from 201 to 107 tokens, a 46.8% sequence reduction. The REDI variant based on incoming attention mass achieves 84.706% Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1K, compared with 83.514% for the dense baseline, 82.634% for incoming attention mass alone, and 81.796% for supervised TF-IDF alone. The same corpus term also improves reduced classification for three alternative attention formulations relative to their attention only counterparts. Together, these controlled comparisons indicate that class specific corpus statistics and image specific attention provide complementary signals for patch ranking in this setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 39 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
- 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 363
- 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Tokens for Efficient Vision Transformercited by 362
- 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Vision Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 228
- 2021Adaptive Token Sampling For Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 183
13 more
- 2021Evo-ViT: Slow-Fast Token Evolution for Dynamic Vision Transformercited by 177
- 2021SPViT: Enabling Faster Vision Transformers via Soft Token Pruningcited by 167
- 2021Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 133
- 2021Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruningcited by 115
- 2022Learning to Merge Tokens in Vision Transformerscited by 65
- 2022Beyond Attentive Tokens: Incorporating Token Importance and Diversity for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 47
- 2022Teaching Matters: Investigating the Role of Supervision in Vision Transformerscited by 45
- 2023Robustifying Token Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 19
- 2026Faster or Stronger: Towards Flexible Visual Place Recognition via Weighted Aggregation and Token Pruningcited by 3
- 2024Visual-Word Tokenizer: Beyond Fixed Sets of Tokens in Vision Transformerscited by 2
- 2026Visual Words Meet BM25: Sparse Auto-Encoder Visual Word Scoring for Image Retrievalcited by 2
- 2026Structural Assessment for Understanding and Guiding Dataset Distillation in Discrete Token Spacecited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Prototype-based Similarity Learning for Few-Shot Object Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Which Tokens to Use? Investigating Token Reduction in Vision Transformers
- 2025Scaling Laws in Patchification: An Image Is Worth 50,176 Tokens And More
- 2026Revisiting Token Compression for Accelerating ViT-based Sparse Multi-View 3D Object Detectors
- 2024Patch Ranking: Efficient CLIP by Learning to Rank Local Patches
- 2025Where Do Tokens Go? Understanding Pruning Behaviors in STEP at High Resolutions
- 2026Unified Spatio-Temporal Token Scoring for Efficient Video VLMs
- 2025DINO-Tok: Adapting DINO for Visual Tokenizers
- 2026When 1+1 Backfires: Rethinking Relevance-Diversity Balancing for Sample-Aware Visual Token Reduction