mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When 1+1 Backfires: Rethinking Relevance-Diversity Balancing for Sample-Aware Visual Token Reduction

arXiv 2610.16615 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Visual token compression has emerged as a critical technique for reducing the inference cost of Vision-Language Models. Existing methods select tokens based on text relevance, visual diversity, or a fixed combination of both---treating the relevance-diversity balance as a universal constant independent of the input. We conduct a systematic analysis to challenge this assumption. At the dataset level, grid-searching the optimal relevance-diversity weight per benchmark reveals substantial cross-task variation. More critically, we further maximize per-sample answer likelihood to recover sample-level oracle weights, finding that their distributions not only differ markedly across benchmarks but also exhibit high within-benchmark variance. Based on these observations, we propose SAVER, a framework for Sample-Aware relevance-diversity balanced Visual tokEn Reduction. We first derive a Geometric Intent Prior (GIP) from the spatial concentration of text-relevant tokens to infer a sample-specific relevance-diversity weight, and then apply this weight to jointly select tokens via a Weighted Text Centroid (WTC) for relevance scoring and a Visual Marginal Coverage Gain (VMCG) for diversity. SAVER requires no additional training and achieves sample-aware balancing entirely at inference time. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SAVER consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across diverse benchmarks, retaining 96.5% of full-model performance on LLaVA-1.5-7B with only 11.1% of the original visual tokens, and further generalizing to LLaVA-NeXT and Mini-Gemini.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

27 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
  2. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering20 Sep

Other references · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  5. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  6. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  7. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  8. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  9. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  10. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 940
  11. 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
  12. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 642
13 more
  1. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inferencecited by 391
  2. 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reductioncited by 294
  3. 2025Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters Morecited by 155
  4. 2024Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inferencecited by 139
  5. 2025Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMscited by 96
  6. 2024ReconBoost: Boosting Can Achieve Modality Reconcilementcited by 60
  7. 2025Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retentioncited by 47
  8. 2025Similarity-Aware Token Pruning: Your VLM but Fastercited by 35
  9. 2025MMTok: Multimodal Coverage Maximization for Efficient Inference of VLMscited by 33
  10. 2026Prune Redundancy, Preserve Essence: Vision Token Compression in VLMs via Synergistic Importance-Diversitycited by 24
  11. 2025Why 1 + 1 < 1 in Visual Token Pruning: Beyond Naive Integration via Multi-Objective Balanced Coveringcited by 11
  12. 2026COMBINER: Composed Image Retrieval Guided by Attribute-based Neighbor Relationscited by 11
  13. 2025VISA: Group-wise Visual Token Selection and Aggregation via Graph Summarization for Efficient MLLMs Inferencecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ToDRE: Effective Visual Token Pruning via Token Diversity and Task Relevance
  2. 2026AnchorPrune: Relevance-Anchored Contextual Expansion for Visual Token Pruning
  3. 2026Moving Beyond Diversity: Visual Token Pruning as Subspace Reconstruction for Efficient VLMs
  4. 2026Not All Visual Tokens Are Equally Safe to Remove:Consequence-Sensitive Visual Token Compression
  5. 2025ZSPAPrune: Zero-Shot Prompt-Aware Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Do All Visual Tokens Matter Equally? Object-Evidence Preserving Token Merging for Vision-Language Retrieval
  7. 2025Are We Using the Right Benchmark: An Evaluation Framework for Visual Token Compression Methods
  8. 2026GOTS: Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection for High-Resolution Vision-Language Models