Linguistic Bias Mitigation for Spoofing Detection via Gradient Reversal and A Variational Information Bottleneck
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid advancements in generative speech technology have compromised the reliability of voice biometrics. While current spoofing detectors excel when assessed under in-domain conditions, generalisation to out-of-domain settings is often poor. We show that this can be due to linguistic bias. A reliance on linguistic cues observed in training data can then compromise robustness to cross-data. We propose a linguistic-invariant spoofing detection framework utilizing teacher-student adversarial learning. The linguistic-aware teacher model, pre-trained on linguistic content of an external dataset, guides the student detector via gradient reversal to minimize the linguistic information. To prevent the inadvertent removal of non-linguistic cues, we incorporate a Variational Information Bottleneck to enable suppression of principal cues. Across nine DF Arena datasets, our method achieves up to a 36.2% relative reduction in the EER compare to the baseline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 30 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
- 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 589
- 2015MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpuscited by 400
- 2019ASVspoof 2019: Future Horizons in Spoofed and Fake Audio Detectioncited by 173
- 2021AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networkscited by 173
- 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
- 2021ASVspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detectioncited by 157
- 2022Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?cited by 129
- 2023SONAR: Sentence-Level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representationscited by 105
- 2022ADD 2022: the First Audio Deep Synthesis Detection Challengecited by 94
12 more
- 2024ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scalecited by 88
- 2023AI-Synthesized Voice Detection Using Neural Vocoder Artifactscited by 41
- 2021Speech is Silver, Silence is Golden: What do ASVspoof-trained Models Really Learn?cited by 36
- 2024The Codecfake Dataset and Countermeasures for the Universally Detection of Deepfake Audiocited by 31
- 2024XLSR-Mamba: A Dual-Column Bidirectional State Space Model for Spoofing Attack Detectioncited by 27
- 2024DFADD: The Diffusion and Flow-Matching Based Audio Deepfake Datasetcited by 20
- 2025Speech DF Arena: A Leaderboard for Speech DeepFake Detection Modelscited by 20
- 2024Where are we in audio deepfake detection? A systematic analysis over generative and detection modelscited by 11
- 2024Exploring WavLM Back-ends for Speech Spoofing and Deepfake Detectioncited by 10
- 2026ASVspoof 5: Evaluation of Spoofing, Deepfake, and Adversarial Attack Detection Using Crowdsourced Speechcited by 5
- 2026Assessing the Impact of Speaker Identity in Speech Spoofing Detectioncited by 5
- 2026Enhancing Multi-Corpus Training in SSL-Based Anti-Spoofing Models: Domain-Invariant Feature Extractioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.