Simple Supervision Is Hard to Beat: A Bitter Lesson from Sparse Target Labels in Domain-Adaptive Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Source-free domain adaptive object detection adapts a source-trained detector to an unlabeled target domain, typically through teacher-student self-training with pseudo-labels. We revisit this setting when a small, uniformly sampled subset of target images is labeled. We introduce Random-Target Supervised Mixing (RTSM), a simple anchor that incorporates these annotations through a supervised detection loss while leaving the original unlabeled adaptation branch unchanged. Across evaluations spanning four SFDA-OD methods, two object detectors, multiple adaptation tasks, and target-label budgets from 1% to 10%, RTSM consistently improves pure SFDA by 1.7 to 18.3 AP50. We then examine whether the same annotations can provide further gains by steering unlabeled self-training. To this end, we evaluate ten sparse-label feedback plugins covering pseudo-label selection, object completion, and optimization control, which yield limited and method-dependent gains over RTSM. These results reveal a bitter lesson for sparse-label SFDA-OD: simple supervision is hard to beat. RTSM therefore provides a simple yet effective anchor for sparse-label SFDA-OD.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
28 of 33 references.
References · 28
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
- 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
16 more
- 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 333
- 2021End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teachercited by 315
- 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 305
- 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
- 2020A Free Lunch for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detection without Source Datacited by 79
- 2020Active Domain Adaptation via Clustering Uncertainty-weighted Embeddingscited by 71
- 2022Unbiased Teacher v2: Semi-supervised Object Detection for Anchor-free and Anchor-based Detectorscited by 69
- 2020Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Asymmetric Tri-way Faster-RCNNcited by 55
- 2022Dense Teacher: Dense Pseudo-Labels for Semi-supervised Object Detectioncited by 48
- 2022NMS Strikes Backcited by 33
- 2023Periodically Exchange Teacher-Student for Source-Free Object Detectioncited by 24
- 2024Enhancing Source-Free Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Low-confidence Pseudo Label Distillationcited by 14
- 2023Exploiting Low-confidence Pseudo-labels for Source-free Object Detectioncited by 13
- 2022Active Source Free Domain Adaptationcited by 10
- 2024Learn from the Learnt: Source-Free Active Domain Adaptation via Contrastive Sampling and Visual Persistencecited by 8
- 2022Universal Domain Adaptive Object Detectorcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.