mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Simple Supervision Is Hard to Beat: A Bitter Lesson from Sparse Target Labels in Domain-Adaptive Object Detection

arXiv 2606.30795 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Source-free domain adaptive object detection adapts a source-trained detector to an unlabeled target domain, typically through teacher-student self-training with pseudo-labels. We revisit this setting when a small, uniformly sampled subset of target images is labeled. We introduce Random-Target Supervised Mixing (RTSM), a simple anchor that incorporates these annotations through a supervised detection loss while leaving the original unlabeled adaptation branch unchanged. Across evaluations spanning four SFDA-OD methods, two object detectors, multiple adaptation tasks, and target-label budgets from 1% to 10%, RTSM consistently improves pure SFDA by 1.7 to 18.3 AP50. We then examine whether the same annotations can provide further gains by steering unlabeled self-training. To this end, we evaluate ten sparse-label feedback plugins covering pseudo-label selection, object completion, and optimization control, which yield limited and method-dependent gains over RTSM. These results reveal a bitter lesson for sparse-label SFDA-OD: simple supervision is hard to beat. RTSM therefore provides a simple yet effective anchor for sparse-label SFDA-OD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

28 of 33 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
  7. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  8. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  9. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  10. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  11. 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
  12. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
16 more
  1. 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 333
  2. 2021End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teachercited by 315
  3. 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 305
  4. 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
  5. 2020A Free Lunch for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detection without Source Datacited by 79
  6. 2020Active Domain Adaptation via Clustering Uncertainty-weighted Embeddingscited by 71
  7. 2022Unbiased Teacher v2: Semi-supervised Object Detection for Anchor-free and Anchor-based Detectorscited by 69
  8. 2020Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Asymmetric Tri-way Faster-RCNNcited by 55
  9. 2022Dense Teacher: Dense Pseudo-Labels for Semi-supervised Object Detectioncited by 48
  10. 2022NMS Strikes Backcited by 33
  11. 2023Periodically Exchange Teacher-Student for Source-Free Object Detectioncited by 24
  12. 2024Enhancing Source-Free Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Low-confidence Pseudo Label Distillationcited by 14
  13. 2023Exploiting Low-confidence Pseudo-labels for Source-free Object Detectioncited by 13
  14. 2022Active Source Free Domain Adaptationcited by 10
  15. 2024Learn from the Learnt: Source-Free Active Domain Adaptation via Contrastive Sampling and Visual Persistencecited by 8
  16. 2022Universal Domain Adaptive Object Detectorcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.