mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Muon learns balanced solutions in matrix factorization without slow saddle-to-saddle dynamics

arXiv 2606.30509 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Matrix factorization (i.e., problems of the form minP,Q |M^star - P^topQ|F2) is a minimal learning problem that exhibits both nonlinear parameter dynamics and representation learning. In this setting, we study how parameter trajectories under the Muon optimizer differ from those of gradient descent. We identify three main dynamical differences: 1) Muon avoids the slow saddle-to-saddle dynamics from small initialization. Muon instead learns all the top modes of M^star at the same rate, with the smaller modes converging first. 2) Muon remains stable even when the learning rate exceeds the critical threshold set by the local loss sharpness. This frees the learning rate from the condition number of the problem, enabling rapid convergence via exponential learning rate annealing. 3) Once the weights are aligned with each other and the target, Muon flow conserves the matrix quantity √P^top P-√Q^top Q, while gradient flow is known to conserve the matrix P^topP - Q^topQ. Despite having distinct conserved quantities, both optimizers find the so-called textitbalanced solution from vanishing initialization. When training from small random initialization, the weights spontaneously align early in training. We derive the alignment rates in simple settings and show that they predict the empirical alignment rates in general. Finally, we exploit structural properties of Muon to construct a learning rate schedule that achieves near-perfect alignment in only two optimization steps.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 26 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
  3. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
  4. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
  5. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 322
  6. 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 193
  7. 2018Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networkscited by 182
  8. 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 177
  9. 2020Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learningcited by 150
  10. 2019Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networkscited by 124
  11. 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 109
  12. 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
12 more
  1. 2021Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Deep Linear Networks: Small Initialization Training, Symmetry, and Sparsitycited by 85
  2. 2025Muon Outperforms Adam in Tail-End Associative Memory Learningcited by 46
  3. 2023Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flowscited by 45
  4. 2025Implicit Bias of Spectral Descent and Muon on Multiclass Separable Datacited by 41
  5. 2025When do spectral gradient updates help in deep learning?cited by 31
  6. 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muoncited by 30
  7. 2025Hyperparameter Transfer Enables Consistent Gains of Matrix-Preconditioned Optimizers Across Scalescited by 21
  8. 2025How Muon's Spectral Design Benefits Generalization: A Study on Imbalanced Datacited by 19
  9. 2026Muon in Associative Memory Learning: Training Dynamics and Scaling Lawscited by 13
  10. 2026Uniform Spectral Growth and Convergence of Muon in LoRA-Style Matrix Factorizationcited by 9
  11. 2025Closed-Form Training Dynamics Reveal Learned Features and Linear Structure in Word2Vec-like Modelscited by 8
  12. 2026Spectral Gradient Descent Mitigates Anisotropy-Driven Misalignment: A Case Study in Phase Retrievalcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.