Toward Secure and Reliable PDDL Formalization of Large Language Models with Planner-in-the-Loop Feedback
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Planning often requires symbolic specifications that are both executable and verifiable. For large language models deployed in autonomous or decision-support systems, failures in such formalization may lead to unverifiable decisions, execution failures, or unsafe downstream behavior. We present NL-PDDL-Bench, a multi-domain benchmark for natural-language-to-PDDL specification construction with planner-verified executability and controlled difficulty scaling by object count. We further propose a planner-in-the-loop framework that uses validator and planner diagnostics to revise non-executable specifications through localized edits. Building on this infrastructure, we develop a planner-grounded optimization recipe that combines parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation supervised fine-tuning, offline planner-derived preference pairs for Direct Preference Optimization, and inference-time planner-in-the-loop repair, without requiring online planner calls during training. We also provide a unified evaluation suite for parseability, solvability, specification similarity, and outcome-aware plan-level consistency against planner references. Experiments on representative model families show substantial gains in planner success and plan-level agreement, with improved robustness under difficulty scaling and cross-domain variation. These results highlight the value of externally verifiable formalization for reliable deployment of LLMs in safety- or security-sensitive planning systems. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/ibasicplan/NL-PDDL-Bench
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 24 references.
References · 14
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
- 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
- 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)cited by 85
- 2024ACPBench: Reasoning about Action, Change, and Planningcited by 39
- 2025LLMs as Planning Formalizers: A Survey for Leveraging Large Language Models to Construct Automated Planning Modelscited by 38
- 2024NL2Plan: Robust LLM-Driven Planning from Minimal Text Descriptionscited by 22
- 2024Leveraging Environment Interaction for Automated PDDL Translation and Planning with Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2024Planning in the Dark: LLM-Symbolic Planning Pipeline without Expertscited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PDDLCoder: Agentic PDDL Generation for LLM-Assisted Symbolic Planning
- 2026From Solver Feedback to Faithful Plans: Multi-Role Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Planning
- 2025Generating Symbolic World Models via Test-time Scaling of Large Language Models
- 2025Language Models For Generalised PDDL Planning: Synthesising Sound and Programmatic Policies
- 2025An Extensive Evaluation of PDDL Capabilities in off-the-shelf LLMs
- 2026Language Models as Higher-Order Planning Formalizers
- 2023Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planning
- 2026Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework