mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sample-Efficient Learning of Probabilistic Causes for Reachability in Markov Decision Processes with Probabilistic Guarantees

arXiv 2606.29681 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probabilistic model checking for Markov decision processes (MDPs) provides quantitative guarantees, but often offers limited insight into why undesired outcomes occur. Probability-raising (PR) causality addresses this by identifying states whose visitation increases the probability of reaching designated states. Existing PR-cause identification methods, however, use MDP modifications not well-suited for learning: the gap between conditional and unconditional reachability probabilities can be hard to detect from transition samples, and construction requires reachability probabilities of the MDP, which are unavailable when transition probabilities are unknown. We study unknown MDPs and propose a learning approach with probabilistic guarantees for PR-cause identification. Our key ingredient is a restart-based MDP modification that reduces PR-cause checking to two conditional reachability queries without using reachability values of the original MDP. We prove correctness, establish sample-complexity bounds, and develop an anytime learning-and-checking algorithm based on two-sided value iteration that progressively classifies states as causal, non-causal, or undecided. Experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate reliable and fast identification of PR causes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

28 of 43 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  2. 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 117
  3. 2014Probably Approximately Correct MDP Learning and Control With Temporal Logic Constraintscited by 54
  4. 2019PAC Statistical Model Checking for Markov Decision Processes and Stochastic Gamescited by 32
  5. 2023Explainable Reinforcement Learning via a Causal World Modelcited by 22
  6. 2014Temporal Logics for Hyperpropertiescited by 19
  7. 2015Permissive Controller Synthesis for Probabilistic Systemscited by 17
  8. 2022Robust Anytime Learning of Markov Decision Processescited by 16
  9. 2023A PAC Learning Algorithm for LTL and Omega-regular Objectives in MDPscited by 13
  10. 2020Distal Explanations for Model-free Explainable Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  11. 2021From Verification to Causality-based Explicationscited by 12
  12. 2020Reinforcement Learning of Control Policy for Linear Temporal Logic Specifications Using Limit-Deterministic Generalized B"uchi Automatacited by 11
16 more
  1. 2022Actual Causality and Responsibility Attribution in Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Processescited by 8
  2. 2020Probabilistic Hyperproperties of Markov Decision Processescited by 6
  3. 2021Probabilistic causes in Markov chainscited by 4
  4. 2022PAC Statistical Model Checking of Mean Payoff in Discrete- and Continuous-Time MDPcited by 4
  5. 2022On probability-raising causality in Markov decision processescited by 3
  6. 2022Causal Temporal Reasoning for Markov Decision Processescited by 3
  7. 2018Counterexamples for Robotic Planning Explained in Structured Languagecited by 2
  8. 2022Foundations of probability-raising causality in Markov decision processescited by 2
  9. 2024Synthesis of Temporal Causalitycited by 2
  10. 2025Closure and Complexity of Temporal Causalitycited by 2
  11. 2025Probability-Raising Causality for Uncertain Parametric Markov Decision Processes with PAC Guaranteescited by 2
  12. 2017Maximizing the Conditional Expected Reward for Reaching the Goalcited by 1
  13. 2020Minimal witnesses for probabilistic timed automatacited by 1
  14. 2021Multi-Objective Controller Synthesis with Uncertain Human Preferencescited by 1
  15. 2023Counterfactuals Modulo Temporal Logicscited by 1
  16. 2024Counterfactual Explanations for MITL Violationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.