ScAle: Attention Head Scaling as a Minimal Adapter for Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Spatial reasoning remains a persistent challenge for many vision language models (VLMs), and improving it typically requires fine-tuning with substantial additional parameters. Our preliminary analysis reveals that rescaling activations in selected transformer layers-without modifying pretrained weights-can significantly influence downstream performance. Motivated by this observation, we propose ScAle, an ultra-lightweight adaptation method that learns a small set of scalar coefficients to modulate last-token attention and MLP activations in a fully frozen backbone. We evaluate our method on the synthetic spatial reasoning benchmark SpatialEval and on real-world VQA datasets (COCOQA and VGQA) across multiple model families. Our method, ScAle, achieves up to 134.1% relative accuracy gains using only 1K trainable parameters without requiring millions of trainable parameters as in standard PEFT methods such as LoRA. Despite its extreme compactness, our approach recovers a substantial fraction of standard PEFT performance while preserving strong non-spatial VQA accuracy. These results demonstrate that bounded activation reweighting provides a simple, architecture-agnostic, and highly parameter-efficient alternative for adapting pretrained VLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 49 references.
References · 17
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 182
- 2024What Matters in Transformers? Not All Attention is Neededcited by 83
- 2025Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinkingcited by 72
- 2025Token Reduction Should Go Beyond Efficiency in Generative Models -- From Vision, Language to Multimodalitycited by 49
- 2025How Do Vision-Language Models Process Conflicting Information Across Modalities?cited by 22
- 2025DraftAttention: Fast Video Diffusion via Low-Resolution Attention Guidancecited by 21
5 more
- 2025Cross-Platform Scaling of Vision-Language-Action Models from Edge to Cloud GPUscited by 8
- 2025SteerVLM: Robust Model Control through Lightweight Activation Steering for Vision Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026Effective MoE-based LLM Compression by Exploiting Heterogeneous Inter-Group Experts Routing Frequency and Information Densitycited by 6
- 2026A Survey of Advancing Audio Super-Resolution and Bandwidth Extension from Discriminative to Generative Modelscited by 5
- 2025Open-Source Multimodal Moxin Models with Moxin-VLM and Moxin-VLAcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas
- 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models
- 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
- 2025Scaling and Beyond: Advancing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs Requires New Recipes
- 2026The Spatial Blindspot of Vision-Language Models
- 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models
- 2026SpatialCORE: Confidence-Aware Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision--Language Models
- 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models