mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Persona-Trained Monte Carlo: Estimating Market-Outcome Distributions via Swarms of Persona-Conditioned Neural Policy Bots in a Limit Order Book

arXiv 2606.29556 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Persona-Trained Monte Carlo (PTMC), a method for estimating distributions of market-outcome statistics by repeatedly simulating limit-order-book interaction among swarms of persona-conditioned neural-policy trading bots. Each run instantiates many bots sharing one trained policy network but conditioned on heterogeneous, individually sampled persona parameters drawn from a learned trader-heterogeneity distribution; the bots interact in a continuous double auction, and the resulting price path is one Monte Carlo sample. Repeating this over independent persona-population draws yields an ensemble from which a target market statistic is estimated. Randomness enters through persona draws, within-run action sampling, and optional exogenous shocks, not solely through price as in classical Monte Carlo. We distinguish PTMC from adjacent paradigms, including classical Monte Carlo, hand-coded agent-based models, single-agent reinforcement learning, and large-language-model-based generative agents. To justify the design, we survey cross-disciplinary foundations -- agent-based computational economics, market microstructure, behavioral finance, deep reinforcement learning, generative/LLM-based agents, news-driven trading, systemic risk, econophysics, and game theory -- connecting each literature to a specific design choice in the policy network, training data, or validation protocol. We formalize the PTMC estimator and its convergence properties, specify a candidate bot architecture and training objective, and propose a four-level validation methodology: stylized-fact matching, microstructure- and agent-level checks, and historical stress-test comparison against a zero-intelligence baseline. The framework is proposed but not implemented: we contribute a formal estimator, a cross-disciplinary design justification, and a validation roadmap, and conclude with open research questions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Learning to simulate realistic limit order book markets from data as a World Agent
  2. 2026PolySwarm: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Prediction Market Trading and Latency Arbitrage
  3. 2026Learning to Sell: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Large Language Model Agents in Multi-Product Markets
  4. 2026Learning to Simulate Individuals from Macro Social Signals
  5. 2025LLM Bidders Preserve the Mechanism-Level Orderings of Human Bidders
  6. 2025When AI Trading Agents Compete: Adverse Selection of Meta-Orders by Reinforcement Learning-Based Market Making
  7. 2023IMM: An Imitative Reinforcement Learning Approach with Predictive Representation Learning for Automatic Market Making
  8. 2025AI PB: A Grounded Generative Agent for Personalized Investment Insights