When AI Trading Agents Compete: Adverse Selection of Meta-Orders by Reinforcement Learning-Based Market Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the mechanisms by which medium-frequency trading agents are adversely selected by opportunistic high-frequency traders. We use reinforcement learning (RL) within a Hawkes Limit Order Book (LOB) model in order to replicate the behaviours of high-frequency market makers. In contrast to the classical models with exogenous price impact assumptions, the Hawkes model accounts for endogenous price impact and other key properties of the market (Jain et al. 2024a). Given the real-world impracticalities of the market maker updating strategies for every event in the LOB, we formulate the high-frequency market making agent via an impulse control reinforcement learning framework (Jain et al. 2025). The RL used in the simulation utilises Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) and self-imitation learning. To replicate the adverse selection phenomenon, we test the RL agent trading against a medium frequency trader (MFT) executing a meta-order and demonstrate that, with training against the MFT meta-order execution agent, the RL market making agent learns to capitalise on the price drift induced by the meta-order. Recent empirical studies have shown that medium-frequency traders are increasingly subject to adverse selection by high-frequency trading agents. As high-frequency trading continues to proliferate across financial markets, the slippage costs incurred by medium-frequency traders are likely to increase over time. However, we do not observe that increased profits for the market making RL agent necessarily cause significantly increased slippages for the MFT agent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2025.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Self-Imitation Learningcited by 135
- 2023Limit Order Book Dynamics and Order Size Modelling Using Compound Hawkes Processcited by 4
- 2024No Tick-Size Too Small: A General Method for Modelling Small Tick Limit Order Bookscited by 1
- 2025Why is the estimation of metaorder impact with public market data so challenging?cited by 1
- 2025LEMs: A Primer On Large Execution Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023IMM: An Imitative Reinforcement Learning Approach with Predictive Representation Learning for Automatic Market Making
- 2025ABIDES-MARL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Environment for Optimal Execution with Endogenous Liquidity ↗
- 2026MetaPS: Adaptive Programmatic Strategy Selection for Market Agents
- 2026Prompt Optimization Enables Stable Algorithmic Collusion in LLM Agents
- 2022Imitate then Transcend: Multi-Agent Optimal Execution with Dual-Window Denoise PPO
- 2024Robot See, Robot Do: Imitation Reward for Noisy Financial Environments
- 2025FlowHFT: Imitation Learning via Flow Matching Policy for Optimal High-Frequency Trading under Diverse Market Conditions
- 2018Market Self-Learning of Signals, Impact and Optimal Trading: Invisible Hand Inference with Free Energy